From: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/doc] ptid from core section
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <h0be50$hla$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1MCaxW-00062z-K9@fencepost.gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1222 bytes --]
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
>> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:09:34 -0400
>>
>> Providing
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-06/msg00079.html
>> gets approved, this patch adds a clue about new callbacks in
>> internal gdb documentation.
>
> Thanks. However,
>
>> Once BFD support is available, writing the apropriate
>> -@code{regset_from_core_section} architecture function should be all
>> +@code{regset_from_core_section} and optionally
>> +@code{ptid_from_core_section_name} and @code{core_section_name_from_ptid}
>> +architecture functions should be all
>> that is needed in order to add support for core files in @value{GDBN}.
>
> this say that the latter two APIs are optional, but does not say a
> word when would the programmer want to define these optional APIs and
> what would she lose if she doesn't. Can you find a concise way of
> saying that without getting into too elaborate details?
>
Here is my attempt to do that.
--
Aleksandar Ristovski
QNX Software Systems
ChangeLog the same:
* doc/gdbinit.texinfo (Adding support for debugging core
files):
Add information about ptid_from_core_section_name and
core_section_name_from_ptid.
[-- Attachment #2: corelow.c-pid-from-section-doc-20090605.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 915 bytes --]
Index: gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.303
diff -u -p -r1.303 gdbint.texinfo
--- gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo 7 May 2009 18:40:43 -0000 1.303
+++ gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo 5 Jun 2009 15:34:43 -0000
@@ -4431,6 +4431,10 @@ core file support in BFD.
Once BFD support is available, writing the apropriate
@code{regset_from_core_section} architecture function should be all
that is needed in order to add support for core files in @value{GDBN}.
+In cases where thread (or lwp depending on the system) numbers are not
+simply appended to appropriate @code{.reg/}
+section name, one also needs to provide @code{ptid_from_core_section_name}
+and @code{core_section_name_from_ptid} architecture functions.
@node Defining Other Architecture Features
@section Defining Other Architecture Features
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-05 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-05 13:10 Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-05 15:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-05 15:38 ` Aleksandar Ristovski [this message]
2009-06-06 0:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='h0be50$hla$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=aristovski@qnx.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox