Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From:  Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
>> Date:  Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:09:34 -0400
>>
>> Providing 
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-06/msg00079.html 
>> gets approved, this patch adds a clue about new callbacks in 
>> internal gdb documentation.
> 
> Thanks.  However,
> 
>>  Once BFD support is available, writing the apropriate
>> -@code{regset_from_core_section} architecture function should be all
>> +@code{regset_from_core_section} and optionally
>> +@code{ptid_from_core_section_name} and @code{core_section_name_from_ptid}
>> +architecture functions should be all
>>  that is needed in order to add support for core files in @value{GDBN}.
> 
> this say that the latter two APIs are optional, but does not say a
> word when would the programmer want to define these optional APIs and
> what would she lose if she doesn't.  Can you find a concise way of
> saying that without getting into too elaborate details?
> 

Here is my attempt to do that.


-- 
Aleksandar Ristovski
QNX Software Systems

ChangeLog the same:


	* doc/gdbinit.texinfo (Adding support for debugging core 
files):
	Add information about ptid_from_core_section_name and
	core_section_name_from_ptid.