From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] C++ify target_ops, toward multi-target
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 22:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff5183d4-f343-5425-183f-73f865b9bc2d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <968579be-9689-d39a-8965-063ff97a4a13@simark.ca>
On 04/29/2018 04:22 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2018-04-14 03:09 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> Here's another chunk from the multi-target branch.
>
> Hi Pedro,
>
> It's kind of difficult to properly review this series, because the important
> non-mechanical bits are lost in a sea of mechanical changes.
Yeah, sorry about that.
> But I didn't
> find anything fundamental I would change, and all you wrote in commit logs
> made sense to me.
>
> Maybe one little comment about 40/40 (because I just finished looking at that
> patch): it might be good to add an assertion (the_native_target == nullptr)
> in set_native_target and one in add_target
> (target_factories.find (&t) == target_factories.end ()). I think it could
> help catch problems if somebody is trying to add a new target or change
> existing ones.
Good idea. I'm adding this to patch #40:
gdb/target.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/target.c b/gdb/target.c
index b957769a3f..824855e7df 100644
--- a/gdb/target.c
+++ b/gdb/target.c
@@ -352,7 +352,11 @@ add_target (const target_info &t, target_open_ftype *func,
{
struct cmd_list_element *c;
- target_factories[&t] = func;
+ auto &func_slot = target_factories[&t];
+ if (func_slot != nullptr)
+ internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
+ "target already added (\"%s\").", t.shortname);
+ func_slot = func;
if (targetlist == NULL)
add_prefix_cmd ("target", class_run, target_command, _("\
@@ -2447,6 +2451,11 @@ static target_ops *the_native_target;
void
set_native_target (target_ops *target)
{
+ if (the_native_target != NULL)
+ internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
+ _("native target already set (\"%s\")."),
+ the_native_target->longname ());
+
the_native_target = target;
}
> Otherwise, I would suggest not waiting too long before merging it to
> avoid having to resolve too many conflicts. Thanks a lot for doing this!
Alright, I wrote the missing ChangeLogs today, and will proceed with
squashing the patches that need to be squashed and getting it all in.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-02 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-14 19:09 Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 17/40] target_ops/C++: macOS/Darwin target Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 23/40] target_ops/C++: IA-64 GNU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 19/40] target_ops/C++: AIX target Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 07/40] target_ops/C++: ravenscar-thread Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 02/40] make-target-delegates: line break between return type and function name Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 09/40] target_ops/C++: bfd-target Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 20/40] target_ops/C++: ARM GNU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 40/40] target factories, target open and multiple instances of targets Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 34/40] target_ops/C++: bsd_kvm_add_target, BSD libkvm target Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 38/40] target_ops: Use bool throughout Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 29/40] target_ops/C++: Tile-Gx GNU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 32/40] target_ops/C++: Generic i386/AMD64 BSD targets Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 27/40] target_ops/C++: SPARC GNU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 39/40] linux_nat_target: More low methods Pedro Alves
2018-04-18 0:40 ` John Baldwin
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 37/40] target_ops/C++: The Hurd Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 03/40] target_ops/C++: exec target Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:10 ` [PATCH 08/40] target_ops/C++: bsd-uthread Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:15 ` [PATCH 14/40] target_ops/C++: PPC/PPC64 GNU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:15 ` [PATCH 12/40] target_ops/C++: target remote-sim Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:15 ` [PATCH 22/40] target_ops/C++: HP-PA GNU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:18 ` [PATCH 04/40] target_ops/C++: core target Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:18 ` [PATCH 24/40] target_ops/C++: m32r GNU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:18 ` [PATCH 36/40] target_ops/C++: go32/DJGPP Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:18 ` [PATCH 25/40] target_ops/C++: m68k GNU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:19 ` [PATCH 35/40] target_ops/C++: NTO/QNX, nto-procfs.c Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:19 ` [PATCH 16/40] target_ops/C++: Windows targets Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:19 ` [PATCH 05/40] target_ops/C++: ctf/tfile targets Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:19 ` [PATCH 31/40] target_ops/C++: Base FreeBSD target Pedro Alves
2018-04-17 16:12 ` John Baldwin
2018-04-17 17:07 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-17 17:28 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2018-04-17 18:13 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-17 18:50 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2018-04-18 0:40 ` John Baldwin
2018-04-18 1:51 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2018-04-18 11:23 ` Pedro Alves
[not found] ` <0b900391-f06d-278c-cbed-b89b207bd12e@redhat.com>
2018-04-18 14:20 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-18 20:55 ` John Baldwin
2018-04-14 19:19 ` [PATCH 26/40] target_ops/C++: s390 GNU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:19 ` [PATCH 30/40] target_ops/C++: Xtensa GNU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:19 ` [PATCH 15/40] target_ops/C++: Solaris/procfs Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:20 ` [PATCH 33/40] target_ops/C++: The rest of the BSD targets Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:20 ` [PATCH 06/40] target_ops/C++: spu-multiarch Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:20 ` [PATCH 11/40] target_ops/C++: remote/extended-remote targets Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:20 ` [PATCH 10/40] target_ops/C++: record targets Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:28 ` [PATCH 28/40] target_ops/C++: SPU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-05-04 17:09 ` Ulrich Weigand
2018-05-04 17:15 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-04 17:22 ` Ulrich Weigand
2018-05-04 17:27 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:28 ` [PATCH 21/40] target_ops/C++: Aarch64 GNU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:29 ` [PATCH 13/40] target_ops/C++: GNU/Linux + x86/AMD64 Pedro Alves
2018-04-14 19:30 ` [PATCH 18/40] target_ops/C++: linux_trad_target, MIPS and Alpha GNU/Linux Pedro Alves
2018-04-16 15:15 ` [RESEND][PATCH 01/40] Convert struct target_ops to C++ Pedro Alves
2018-05-03 0:06 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-27 21:58 ` 8.2 regression for invalid -data-directory [Re: [RESEND][PATCH 01/40] Convert struct target_ops to C++] Jan Kratochvil
2018-10-30 20:24 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-14 15:30 ` [RESEND][PATCH 01/40] Convert struct target_ops to C++ Thomas Schwinge
2018-04-27 15:47 ` [PATCH 00/40] C++ify target_ops, toward multi-target Tom Tromey
2018-05-02 22:55 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-29 15:22 ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-02 22:51 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff5183d4-f343-5425-183f-73f865b9bc2d@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simark@simark.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox