Re: [PATCH 31/40] target_ops/C++: Base FreeBSD target

[Kamil Rytarowski <n54@gmx.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1597 bytes --]

On 18.04.2018 02:37, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 06:07:37 PM Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 04/17/2018 05:05 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Saturday, April 14, 2018 08:09:44 PM Pedro Alves wrote:
>>>> The
>>>>
>>>>   $architecture x NetBSD/OpenBSD/FreeBSD
>>>>
>>>> support matrix complicates things a bit.  There's common BSD target
>>>> code, and there's common architecture-specific code shared between the
>>>> different BSDs.  Current, all that is stiched together to form a final
>>>> target, via the i386bsd_target, x86bsd_target, fbsd_nat_add_target
>>>> functions etc.
>>>>
>>>> Introduces a fbsd_nat_target base/prototype target.  To be used in
>>>> following patches.
>>>
>>> I will do some tests of FreeBSD/amd64 first and let you know what I find.
>>
>> Thank you!
> 
> I've pushed a target_ops-cxx branch to github.com/bsdjhb/gdb.git that has
> some small fixups (compile fixes).  I've built the amd64, i386, arm, and
> aarch64 FreeBSD native targets so far.  Simple testing of the the amd64
> and i386 binaries seems to work, but I encountered a new test failure
> in the testsuite for FreeBSD/amd64 that is a bit odd.  In particular,
> I get a core dump running 'info set' when it tries to display the
> current setting of whether ASLR is disabled.  Looking at the core of gdb:
> 

I've checked this branch on NetBSD/amd64 8.99.7 (target_ops-cxx
github.com/bsdjhb/gdb.git). It builds and it's not fully functional..
perhaps not much different to previous versions, for I'm not going to
open new threads and focus on kernel fixes.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 850 bytes --]