From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] scoped_ignore_signal: Use sigprocmask+sigtimedwait instead of signal
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 08:35:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1c260ed-4a44-7e36-f0ce-733262836f24@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210615111429.1879286-4-pedro@palves.net>
On 2021-06-15 7:14 a.m., Pedro Alves wrote:
> The problem with using signal(...) to temporarily ignore a signal, is
> that that changes the the signal disposition for the whole process.
> If multiple threads do it at the same time, you have a race.
>
> Fix this by using sigprocmask + sigtimedwait to implement the ignoring
> instead, if available, which I think probably means everywhere except
> Windows nowadays. This way, we only change the signal mask for the
> current thread, so there's no race.
I tried to build on macOS today and got:
CXX compile/compile.o
In file included from /Users/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/compile/compile.c:46:
/Users/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_signal.h:69:4: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sigtimedwait'
sigtimedwait (&set, nullptr, &zero_timeout);
^
I didn't have time to dig yet.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-26 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-15 11:14 [PATCH 0/4] Introduce scoped_ignore_signal & make it thread safe Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] Move scoped_ignore_sigttou to gdbsupport/ Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] Introduce scoped_restore_signal Pedro Alves
2021-06-17 14:57 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] scoped_ignore_signal: Use sigprocmask+sigtimedwait instead of signal Pedro Alves
2021-06-26 12:35 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-06-26 13:41 ` John Baldwin
2021-06-26 19:10 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-27 14:55 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-27 19:01 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] Add a unit test for scoped_ignore_sigpipe Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 22:26 ` Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches
2021-06-17 13:00 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 17:04 ` [PATCH 0/4] Introduce scoped_ignore_signal & make it thread safe John Baldwin
2021-06-17 14:38 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-17 15:36 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-17 16:45 ` John Baldwin
2021-06-17 18:44 ` [pushed] Don't call sigtimedwait for scoped_ignore_sigttou Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 20:16 ` [PATCH 0/4] Introduce scoped_ignore_signal & make it thread safe Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f1c260ed-4a44-7e36-f0ce-733262836f24@polymtl.ca \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox