Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] scoped_ignore_signal: Use sigprocmask+sigtimedwait instead of signal
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 15:10:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e2f4788-84c3-1ef3-e346-7630a6e550bb@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6dca033a-1b6f-05df-8dd0-e1cc2c7d85d2@FreeBSD.org>

On 2021-06-26 9:41 a.m., John Baldwin wrote:
> On 6/26/21 5:35 AM, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote:
>> On 2021-06-15 7:14 a.m., Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> The problem with using signal(...) to temporarily ignore a signal, is
>>> that that changes the the signal disposition for the whole process.
>>> If multiple threads do it at the same time, you have a race.
>>>
>>> Fix this by using sigprocmask + sigtimedwait to implement the ignoring
>>> instead, if available, which I think probably means everywhere except
>>> Windows nowadays.  This way, we only change the signal mask for the
>>> current thread, so there's no race.
>>
>> I tried to build on macOS today and got:
>>
>>
>>        CXX    compile/compile.o
>>      In file included from /Users/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/compile/compile.c:46:
>>      /Users/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_signal.h:69:4: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sigtimedwait'
>>                sigtimedwait (&set, nullptr, &zero_timeout);
>>                ^
>>
>> I didn't have time to dig yet.
> 
> It looks like macOS doesn't implement either sigtimedwait() or sigwaitinfo()
> which are part of POSIX from 1996 (*sigh*); however, macOS does provide
> sigpending() and sigwait(), so perhaps we can do something like:
> 
>    if (ConsumePending)
>      {
> #ifdef HAVE_SIGTIMEDWAIT
>        const timespec zero_timeout = {};
> 
>        sigtimedwait (&set, nullptr, &zero_timeout);
> #else
>        sigset_t pending;
> 
>        sigpending (&pending);
>        if (sigismember (&pending, SIG))

SIG -> Sig

>          sigwait (&set, nullptr);
> #endif
>      }
> 
> (Ironically, sigwait() was added to POSIX in the same version of the spec as
> sigtimedwait().)
> 

Thanks.  At least that change fixes that particular build issue, but I
can't tell if it has the correct behavior though (I haven't looked at
what sigtimedwait / sigwait do yet...).

Simon

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-26 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-15 11:14 [PATCH 0/4] Introduce scoped_ignore_signal & make it thread safe Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] Move scoped_ignore_sigttou to gdbsupport/ Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] Introduce scoped_restore_signal Pedro Alves
2021-06-17 14:57   ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] scoped_ignore_signal: Use sigprocmask+sigtimedwait instead of signal Pedro Alves
2021-06-26 12:35   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-26 13:41     ` John Baldwin
2021-06-26 19:10       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-06-27 14:55       ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-27 19:01         ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] Add a unit test for scoped_ignore_sigpipe Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 22:26   ` Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches
2021-06-17 13:00     ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 17:04 ` [PATCH 0/4] Introduce scoped_ignore_signal & make it thread safe John Baldwin
2021-06-17 14:38   ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-17 15:36     ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-17 16:45       ` John Baldwin
2021-06-17 18:44         ` [pushed] Don't call sigtimedwait for scoped_ignore_sigttou Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 20:16 ` [PATCH 0/4] Introduce scoped_ignore_signal & make it thread safe Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3e2f4788-84c3-1ef3-e346-7630a6e550bb@polymtl.ca \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jhb@FreeBSD.org \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox