From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] scoped_ignore_signal: Use sigprocmask+sigtimedwait instead of signal
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:14:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210615111429.1879286-4-pedro@palves.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210615111429.1879286-1-pedro@palves.net>
The problem with using signal(...) to temporarily ignore a signal, is
that that changes the the signal disposition for the whole process.
If multiple threads do it at the same time, you have a race.
Fix this by using sigprocmask + sigtimedwait to implement the ignoring
instead, if available, which I think probably means everywhere except
Windows nowadays. This way, we only change the signal mask for the
current thread, so there's no race.
Change-Id: Idfe3fb08327ef8cae926f3de9ee81c56a83b1738
gdbsupport/ChangeLog:
yyyy-mm-dd Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
* scoped_ignore_signal.h
(scoped_ignore_signal::scoped_ignore_signal)
[HAVE_SIGPROCMASK]: Use sigprocmask to block the signal instead of
changing the signal disposition for the whole process.
(scoped_ignore_signal::~scoped_ignore_signal) [HAVE_SIGPROCMASK]:
Use sigtimedwait and sigprocmask to flush and unblock the signal.
---
gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_signal.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_signal.h b/gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_signal.h
index cccd390529b..55a921cb332 100644
--- a/gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_signal.h
+++ b/gdbsupport/scoped_ignore_signal.h
@@ -22,7 +22,10 @@
#include <signal.h>
-/* RAII class used to ignore a signal in a scope. */
+/* RAII class used to ignore a signal in a scope. If sigprocmask is
+ supported, then the signal is only ignored by the calling thread.
+ Otherwise, the signal disposition is set to SIG_IGN, which affects
+ the whole process. */
template <int Sig>
class scoped_ignore_signal
@@ -30,18 +33,48 @@ class scoped_ignore_signal
public:
scoped_ignore_signal ()
{
+#ifdef HAVE_SIGPROCMASK
+ sigset_t set, old_state;
+
+ sigemptyset (&set);
+ sigaddset (&set, Sig);
+ sigprocmask (SIG_BLOCK, &set, &old_state);
+ m_was_blocked = sigismember (&old_state, Sig);
+#else
m_osig = signal (Sig, SIG_IGN);
+#endif
}
~scoped_ignore_signal ()
{
+#ifdef HAVE_SIGPROCMASK
+ if (!m_was_blocked)
+ {
+ sigset_t set;
+ const timespec zero_timeout = {};
+
+ sigemptyset (&set);
+ sigaddset (&set, Sig);
+
+ /* If we got a pending Sig signal, consume it before
+ unblocking. */
+ sigtimedwait (&set, nullptr, &zero_timeout);
+
+ sigprocmask (SIG_UNBLOCK, &set, nullptr);
+ }
+#else
signal (Sig, m_osig);
+#endif
}
DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN (scoped_ignore_signal);
private:
- sighandler_t m_osig = nullptr;
+#ifdef HAVE_SIGPROCMASK
+ bool m_was_blocked;
+#else
+ sighandler_t m_osig;
+#endif
};
struct scoped_ignore_signal_nop
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-15 11:14 [PATCH 0/4] Introduce scoped_ignore_signal & make it thread safe Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] Move scoped_ignore_sigttou to gdbsupport/ Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] Introduce scoped_restore_signal Pedro Alves
2021-06-17 14:57 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 11:14 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2021-06-26 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] scoped_ignore_signal: Use sigprocmask+sigtimedwait instead of signal Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-26 13:41 ` John Baldwin
2021-06-26 19:10 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-27 14:55 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-27 19:01 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] Add a unit test for scoped_ignore_sigpipe Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 22:26 ` Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches
2021-06-17 13:00 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 17:04 ` [PATCH 0/4] Introduce scoped_ignore_signal & make it thread safe John Baldwin
2021-06-17 14:38 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-17 15:36 ` Pedro Alves
2021-06-17 16:45 ` John Baldwin
2021-06-17 18:44 ` [pushed] Don't call sigtimedwait for scoped_ignore_sigttou Pedro Alves
2021-06-15 20:16 ` [PATCH 0/4] Introduce scoped_ignore_signal & make it thread safe Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210615111429.1879286-4-pedro@palves.net \
--to=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox