Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fix tkill_failed gcc warning in gdbserver
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e394668d0912211248i3994aedck48638292baf5d3f9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e394668d0912211236je4c94bbt3063f9dbcaeeef6c@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:10:33PM -0800, Doug Evans wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> android doesn't have SYS_tkill but it does have __NR_tkill.
>>
>> Does it have the other SYS_ constants?  It's a weird omission.
>> Anyway, might as well use __NR_tkill unconditionally.
>
> The next question is, does gdbserver need to check for
> syscall.h/syscall() like gdb does?
> Or can I just replace #ifdef SYS_tkill with #ifdef __NR_tkill.
> gdbserver includes sys/syscall.h unconditionally, gdb/linux-nat.c  does not.
> gdb also checks for __NR_tkill in a way that works if it were an enum.
> Does one need to worry about that case?
>

How about this?

2009-12-21  Doug Evans  <dje@google.com>

        gdb/
        * linux-nat.c (kill_lwp): Minor cleanup, move definition of
        tkill_failed into ifdef HAVE_TKILL_SYSCALL.  Move setting of errno
        there too.  Delete unnecessary resetting of errno after syscall.
	Minor comment changes to match gdbserver/linux-low.c:kill_lwp.

        gdbserver/
        * linux-low.c (kill_lwp): Use __NR_tkill instead of SYS_tkill.
        Move definition of tkill_failed to ifdef __NR_tkill to avoid gcc
        warning ifndef __NR_tkill.  Move setting of errno there too.
        Delete unnecessary resetting of errno after syscall.
        Minor comment changes to match gdb/linux-nat.c:kill_lwp.

Index: linux-nat.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/linux-nat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.156
diff -u -p -r1.156 linux-nat.c
--- linux-nat.c 20 Nov 2009 19:48:45 -0000      1.156
+++ linux-nat.c 21 Dec 2009 20:39:15 -0000
@@ -2034,27 +2034,29 @@ linux_nat_resume (struct target_ops *ops
     target_async (inferior_event_handler, 0);
 }

-/* Issue kill to specified lwp.  */
-
-static int tkill_failed;
+/* Send a signal to an LWP.  */

 static int
 kill_lwp (int lwpid, int signo)
 {
-  errno = 0;
-
-/* Use tkill, if possible, in case we are using nptl threads.  If tkill
-   fails, then we are not using nptl threads and we should be using kill.  */
+  /* Use tkill, if possible, in case we are using nptl threads.  If tkill
+     fails, then we are not using nptl threads and we should be using kill.  */

 #ifdef HAVE_TKILL_SYSCALL
-  if (!tkill_failed)
-    {
-      int ret = syscall (__NR_tkill, lwpid, signo);
-      if (errno != ENOSYS)
-       return ret;
-      errno = 0;
-      tkill_failed = 1;
-    }
+  {
+    static int tkill_failed;
+
+    if (!tkill_failed)
+      {
+       int ret;
+
+       errno = 0;
+       ret = syscall (__NR_tkill, lwpid, signo);
+       if (errno != ENOSYS)
+         return ret;
+       tkill_failed = 1;
+      }
+  }
 #endif

   return kill (lwpid, signo);
Index: gdbserver/linux-low.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c,v
retrieving revision 1.117
diff -u -p -r1.117 linux-low.c
--- gdbserver/linux-low.c       21 Dec 2009 17:54:03 -0000      1.117
+++ gdbserver/linux-low.c       21 Dec 2009 20:39:15 -0000
@@ -1572,25 +1584,29 @@ linux_wait (ptid_t ptid,

   return event_ptid;
 }

-/* Send a signal to an LWP.  For LinuxThreads, kill is enough; however, if
-   thread groups are in use, we need to use tkill.  */
+/* Send a signal to an LWP.  */

 static int
 kill_lwp (unsigned long lwpid, int signo)
 {
-  static int tkill_failed;
+  /* Use tkill, if possible, in case we are using nptl threads.  If tkill
+     fails, then we are not using nptl threads and we should be using kill.  */

-  errno = 0;
+#ifdef __NR_tkill
+  {
+    static int tkill_failed;

-#ifdef SYS_tkill
-  if (!tkill_failed)
-    {
-      int ret = syscall (SYS_tkill, lwpid, signo);
-      if (errno != ENOSYS)
-       return ret;
-      errno = 0;
-      tkill_failed = 1;
-    }
+    if (!tkill_failed)
+      {
+       int ret;
+
+       errno = 0;
+       ret = syscall (__NR_tkill, lwpid, signo);
+       if (errno != ENOSYS)
+         return ret;
+       tkill_failed = 1;
+      }
+  }
 #endif

   return kill (lwpid, signo);


  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-21 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-21 20:10 Doug Evans
2009-12-21 20:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-12-21 20:23   ` Doug Evans
2009-12-21 20:36   ` Doug Evans
2009-12-21 20:49     ` Doug Evans [this message]
2009-12-21 20:55       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-12-21 20:55     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e394668d0912211248i3994aedck48638292baf5d3f9@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox