Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] detect inferior exit in call_function_by_hand
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e394668d0811132303v63d82a6fv39bc0bc533087870@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081114005333.GC12802@adacore.com>

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>> +    send_gdb "set language c\n"
>> +    gdb_expect {
>> +     -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {}
>> +     timeout { fail "set language c (timeout)" ; return 0; }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    send_gdb "show language\n"
>> +    gdb_expect {
>> +     -re ".* source language is \"c\".*$gdb_prompt $" {
>> +         pass "set language to \"c\""
>> +         return 1
>> +     }
>> +     -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {
>> +         fail "setting language to \"c\""
>> +         return 0
>> +     }
>> +     timeout {
>> +         fail "can't show language (timeout)"
>> +         return 0
>> +     }
>> +    }
>
> Generally speaking, we try to avoid send_gdb/gdb_expect, and use
> gdb_test_multiple. I realize that you probably inherited this
> through copy/paste... In any case, I don't think it will necessary
> to rewrite the above, because, Like Pedro, I don't think you need
> the set lang c. The only time when I had to explicitly set the language
> is after attaching to a program - you never know where you might end up,
> and sometimes you find your way into asm frames, for instance. I propose
> you remove this part entirely. That should simplify your testcase and
> it's easy enough to put it back if we discover a case where it's
> really needed.
>
>> +if { ![set_lang_c] } {
>> +    gdb_suppress_tests;
>> +} else {
>> +    if { ![runto_main] } {
>> +     gdb_suppress_tests;
>> +    }
>
> We don't use gdb_suppress_tests anymore. As far as I know, the usual
> way of doing things is to log a FAIL and then return. For instance:
>
>    if ![runto_main] then {
>        fail "Can't run to main"
>        return 0
>    }

In past lives, I've often found it useful to never introduce fails
that don't also have passes - it makes regression reports cleaner:
otherwise tests that failed the previous time but now pass disappear
and the test count has gone down leading one to wonder if there's a
testsuite issue.  In this case it doesn't matter as the gdb testsuite
is all over the map so I'm happy to just go with the flow.


      reply	other threads:[~2008-11-14  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-12  8:32 Doug Evans
2008-11-12  8:33 ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-14 11:43 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-11-14 13:51   ` Doug Evans [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e394668d0811132303v63d82a6fv39bc0bc533087870@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dje@google.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox