From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] detect inferior exit in call_function_by_hand
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081114005333.GC12802@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081111225021.015C61C79A1@localhost>
> + send_gdb "set language c\n"
> + gdb_expect {
> + -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {}
> + timeout { fail "set language c (timeout)" ; return 0; }
> + }
> +
> + send_gdb "show language\n"
> + gdb_expect {
> + -re ".* source language is \"c\".*$gdb_prompt $" {
> + pass "set language to \"c\""
> + return 1
> + }
> + -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {
> + fail "setting language to \"c\""
> + return 0
> + }
> + timeout {
> + fail "can't show language (timeout)"
> + return 0
> + }
> + }
Generally speaking, we try to avoid send_gdb/gdb_expect, and use
gdb_test_multiple. I realize that you probably inherited this
through copy/paste... In any case, I don't think it will necessary
to rewrite the above, because, Like Pedro, I don't think you need
the set lang c. The only time when I had to explicitly set the language
is after attaching to a program - you never know where you might end up,
and sometimes you find your way into asm frames, for instance. I propose
you remove this part entirely. That should simplify your testcase and
it's easy enough to put it back if we discover a case where it's
really needed.
> +if { ![set_lang_c] } {
> + gdb_suppress_tests;
> +} else {
> + if { ![runto_main] } {
> + gdb_suppress_tests;
> + }
We don't use gdb_suppress_tests anymore. As far as I know, the usual
way of doing things is to log a FAIL and then return. For instance:
if ![runto_main] then {
fail "Can't run to main"
return 0
}
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-14 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-12 8:32 Doug Evans
2008-11-12 8:33 ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-14 11:43 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2008-11-14 13:51 ` Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081114005333.GC12802@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox