Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA, 3 of 3] save/restore process record, part 3 (save/restore)
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <daef60380910222234v5303855fm62e19463567bd216@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE0B40B.5020802@vmware.com>

Cool.  Thanks, Michael.

I got some fail with testsuite:
consecutive-precsave.exp
solib-precsave.exp
until-precsave.exp

I will try to fix them.

Hui

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 03:35, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:58, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Michael Snyder wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 01:54, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think you want unlink the gdb_record when save get some error.  It
>>>>>>> maybe need "discard_cleanups" the old_cleanups and bfd_close (obfd);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After change the code, everything is OK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes.  Thanks.  Like this:
>>>>>> +      if (record_list->prev)
>>>>>> +        record_list = record_list->prev;
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +  do_cleanups (set_cleanups);
>>>>>> +  bfd_close (obfd);
>>>>>> +  discard_cleanups (old_cleanups);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +  /* Succeeded.  */
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest:
>>>>> +  discard_cleanups (old_cleanups);
>>>>> +  bfd_close (obfd);
>>>>
>>>> The reason I did the bfd_close first is because I wasn't
>>>> sure if it was safe to delete the file first.  In any way,
>>>> it seems more logical to close the file before delete it.
>>>
>>> Oh, oops, never mind.  My head's fuzzy today.
>>>
>>> Why do you suggest to change the order?
>>> Just curious, I don't have an issue with it...
>>>
>>
>> Sorry I didn't talk the function very clear.
>>
>>>>>> +  bfd_close (obfd);
>>>>>> +  discard_cleanups (old_cleanups);
>>
>> Before "discard_cleanups (old_cleanups);", the "record_save_cleanups"
>> will be call sometime.  "record_save_cleanups" will call "bfd_close
>> (obfd)".
>> If the record_save_cleanups will happen after "bfd_close (obfd)".
>> "bfd_close (obfd)" will be call twice.
>>
>> Of curse, most of time it will not happen.   So I just suggest.  :)
>
> OK, done and committed.
>
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-23  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-17  1:32 Michael Snyder
2009-10-17  8:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-17 18:42   ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-17 20:11     ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-17 22:19       ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-18  2:23         ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-18  3:59           ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-18  4:06         ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-18  4:10           ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-19  4:34             ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-19 18:00               ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-20  2:47                 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-20 20:03                   ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-20 20:05                     ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-21  2:36                       ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-22 19:42                         ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-22 20:40                           ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-22 21:00                             ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-22 21:25                               ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-23  0:45                                 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-23  1:05                                   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-23  5:35                                     ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-23  8:52                                     ` Pierre Muller
2009-10-23 10:08                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-23 14:42                                         ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-23 14:54                                           ` Pedro Alves
2009-10-31 14:57                                             ` Pedro Alves
2009-11-01  9:54                                               ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-23 14:58                                           ` Pedro Alves
2009-10-23 14:46                                         ` Andreas Schwab
2009-10-23 14:55                                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-23 15:35                                             ` Andreas Schwab
2009-10-23 15:48                                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-23 16:31                                                 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-10-23 15:09                                         ` Pierre Muller
2009-10-23  5:35                           ` Hui Zhu [this message]
2009-10-23 15:56                             ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-23 16:01                               ` Michael Snyder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=daef60380910222234v5303855fm62e19463567bd216@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=teawater@gmail.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox