Re: [RFA] Fix probable typo in i386_process_record

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

I think this patch is OK.  Thanks a lot.

Hui

On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 08:57, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
> Hui, I'm *pretty* sure I got this right, but you'd better confirm:
>
>
> 2009-10-09  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@vmware.com>
>
>        * i386-tdep.c (i386_process_record): Or-equals, not not-equals.
>
> Index: i386-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.288
> diff -u -p -r1.288 i386-tdep.c
> --- i386-tdep.c 28 Sep 2009 07:11:36 -0000      1.288
> +++ i386-tdep.c 10 Oct 2009 00:58:09 -0000
> @@ -4146,7 +4146,7 @@ reswitch:
>        return -1;
>       if (ir.mod == 3)
>        {
> -         ir.rm != ir.rex_b;
> +         ir.rm |= ir.rex_b;
>          if (ir.ot == OT_BYTE && !ir.regmap[X86_RECORD_R8_REGNUM])
>            ir.rm &= 0x3;
>          I386_RECORD_ARCH_LIST_ADD_REG (ir.rm);
>
>