Re: final i386.floating.record.patch

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

I think you can do it with youself.

Hui

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 21:05, paawan oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As I understand you have tried to run the example test code which I had sent earlier.
>
> please let me know at which c statement (or insn) it is causing this ?
> So I can dig into it more.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Oza.
>
>
> --- On Tue, 8/4/09, paawan oza <paawan1982@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> From: paawan oza <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
>> Subject: Re: final i386.floating.record.patch
>> To: "Hui Zhu" <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@vmware.com>, "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>> Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 6:32 PM
>> Hi Hui,
>> I am not sure which test case (insn)  caused this.
>> would you please send me the example (.c file) which you
>> have tried to run ?
>> please also try to let me know at which insn (at which
>> point it fails).
>> Regards,
>> Oza.
>>
>> --- On Tue, 8/4/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> > Subject: Re: final i386.floating.record.patch
>> > To: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
>> > Cc: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@vmware.com>,
>> "gdb-patches@sourceware.org"
>> <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>> > Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 8:49 AM
>> > Hi Paawan,
>> >
>> > Thanks for your work.
>> >
>> > I do a some test works with the test code that you
>> sent in
>> > before.
>> > I get the values of fp reg with command "info
>> > all-registers".
>> >
>> > It looks like some fp reg's values not right in
>> replay
>> > mode.
>> >
>> > In record mode they are:
>> > fctrl
>> > 0x37f    895
>> > fstat
>> > 0x0    0
>> > ftag
>> >    0xffff    65535
>> > fiseg
>> > 0x0    0
>> > fioff
>> > 0x0    0
>> > ---Type <return> to continue, or q
>> <return> to
>> > quit---
>> > foseg
>> > 0x0    0
>> > fooff
>> > 0x0    0
>> > fop
>> > 0x0    0
>> >
>> > In replay mode they are:
>> > fctrl
>> > 0x37f    895
>> > fstat
>> > 0x6069    24681
>> > ftag
>> >    0x557f    21887
>> > fiseg
>> > 0x73    115
>> > fioff
>> > 0x8048bfd    134515709
>> > ---Type <return> to continue, or q
>> <return> to
>> > quit---
>> > foseg
>> > 0x7b    123
>> > fooff
>> > 0x0    0
>> > fop
>> > 0x2e9    745
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Hui
>> >
>> >
>> > #include <stdio.h>
>> > #include <math.h>
>> > #include <stdlib.h>
>> >
>> > /* the test intends to test following insns.
>> > flds faddp fstps fstpl fldl fxch fabs fdivrp fmulp
>> fsubrp
>> > fucomp fnstsw fsqrt
>> > fchs f2xm1 fyl2x fxtract fprem1 fld fdecstp fld1
>> fldl2t
>> > fldl2e FLDPI
>> > FLDLG2 FLDLN2
>> > FLDZ fincstp ffree fptan fpatan fincstp fsincos
>> frndint
>> > fscale fsin fcos fcmovb
>> > fcmovbe fcmove fcmovu fcmovnb fcmovnbe fsave frstor
>> fstsw
>> > */
>> >
>> > float no1,no2,no3,no4,no5,no6,no7;
>> > double x = 100.345, y = 25.7789;
>> > long double ldx = 88888888888888888888.88, ldy =
>> > 9999999999999999999.99;
>> > float result,resultd,resultld;
>> > float *float_memory;
>> >
>> > /* initialization of floats */
>> > void init_floats()
>> > {
>> >  no1 = 10.45;
>> >  no2 = 20.77;
>> >  no3 = 156.89874646;
>> >  no4 = 14.56;
>> >  no5 = 11.11;
>> >  no6 = 66.77;
>> >  no7 = 88.88;
>> >  float_memory = malloc(sizeof(float) * 4);
>> >  *float_memory = 256.256;
>> >  *(float_memory + 1) = 356.356;
>> >  *(float_memory + 2) = 456.456;
>> >  *(float_memory + 3) = 556.556;
>> > }
>> >
>> > /* marks FPU stack as empty */
>> > void empty_fpu_stack()
>> > {
>> >  asm ("ffree %st(1) \n\t"
>> >       "ffree %st(2) \n\t"
>> >       "ffree %st(3) \n\t"
>> >       "ffree %st(4) \n\t"
>> >       "ffree %st(5) \n\t"
>> >       "ffree %st(6) \n\t"
>> >       "ffree %st(7)");
>> > }
>> >
>> > /* tests floating point arithmatic */
>> > void test_arith_floats()
>> > {
>> >  result = no1 + no2 + no3 + no4 + no5 + no6 +
>> no7;
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >  result = fmodf(no2,no1);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >  resultd = fmod(x,y);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",resultd);
>> >
>> >  resultld = fmodl(ldy,ldy);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",resultld);
>> >
>> >  result = fabsf(no1);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >  result = no3 / no4;
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >  result = no1 * no2 * no3 * no4;
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >  result = no1 - no2 - no3 - no4;
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >  asm ("fchs");
>> >
>> >  /* test for f2xm1 */
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >  asm ("f2xm1");
>> >
>> >  asm ("fyl2x");
>> >
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >  asm ("fxtract");
>> >
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >  asm ("fprem1");
>> >
>> >  /* decrement fpu stack pointer only status
>> register should
>> > get affected */
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >
>> >  empty_fpu_stack();
>> >
>> >  asm ("fld1");
>> >  asm ("fldl2t");
>> >  asm ("fldl2e");
>> >  asm ("fldpi");
>> >  asm ("fldlg2");
>> >  asm ("fldln2");
>> >  asm ("fldz");
>> >
>> >  empty_fpu_stack();
>> >  /* finishing emptying the stack */
>> >
>> >  result = sqrt(no3);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> > }
>> >
>> > void test_log_exp_floats()
>> > {
>> >  result = log10(no3);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >  result = log(no3);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >  result = exp10(no3);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >  result = exp(no3);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> > }
>> >
>> > void test_trigo_floats()
>> > {
>> >  result = sin(30);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >  result = cos(30);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >  result = tan(30);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >  result = atan(30);
>> >  printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >  asm ("fptan");
>> >
>> >  /* changes st1 and popping register stack */
>> >  asm ("fpatan");
>> >
>> >  asm("fincstp");
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(float_memory));
>> >  asm ("fsincos");
>> >
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >  asm ("frndint");
>> >
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*(float_memory+1)));
>> >  asm ("fscale");
>> >
>> >  empty_fpu_stack();
>> >
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >  asm ("fsin");
>> >  asm ("fcos");
>> >
>> >  /* currently we assume condition likely and
>> always record
>> > the registers
>> >  code could be optimized only if the flag is set
>> then
>> > record */
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >  asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*(float_memory+1)));
>> >  asm ("fcmovb %st(1), %st");
>> >  asm ("fcmovbe %st(1), %st");
>> >  asm ("fcmove %st(1), %st");
>> >  asm ("fcmovu %st(1), %st");
>> >  asm ("fcmovnb %st(1), %st");
>> >  asm ("fcmovnbe %st(1), %st");
>> >
>> >  empty_fpu_stack();
>> >  /* finished emtyping the stack */
>> > }
>> >
>> > void test_compare_floats()
>> > {
>> >    ldy = 88888888888888888888.88;
>> >    if (ldx == ldy)
>> >      ldy =
>> > 7777777777777777777777777777.777;
>> >    else
>> >      ldy =
>> > 666666666666666666666666666.666;
>> > }
>> >
>> > /* test loading and saving of FPU environment */
>> > void test_fpu_env()
>> > {
>> >  asm ("fsave %0" : "=m"(*float_memory) : );
>> >  asm ("frstor %0" : : "m"(*float_memory));
>> >  asm ("fstsw %ax");
>> > }
>> >
>> > int main()
>> > {
>> >    init_floats();
>> >    test_arith_floats();
>> >    test_log_exp_floats();
>> >    test_trigo_floats();
>> >    test_compare_floats();
>> >    test_fpu_env();
>> > }
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 22:56, paawan oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > please find the patch attached. I have attached
>> as per
>> > your suggestion.
>> > > I am attaching it from opera browser.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Oza.
>> > >
>> > > --- On Thu, 7/30/09, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
>> > >> Subject: Re: final
>> i386.floating.record.patch
>> > >> To: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
>> > >> Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org"
>> > <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>> > >> Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 11:31 PM
>> > >> paawan oza wrote:
>> > >> > Hi,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > please find my answers below.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >  1) Are you using a Windows machine to
>> send
>> > your
>> > >> >  emails?  If so,
>> > >> >  is it possible that there is a
>> Unix/Linux
>> > >> machine you could
>> > >> >  try
>> > >> >  sending from?  Your attachments look
>> OK
>> > for
>> > >> me, but
>> > >> >  some people
>> > >> >  seem to have had problems with them.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Oza : I used to send all from windows
>> till
>> > now.
>> > >> > but this patch I sent it from
>> Linux...from
>> > opera.
>> > >> >   2) And are you using cut-and-paste
>> to
>> > >> insert the patches
>> > >> >  into the
>> > >> >  body of your email?  That would
>> certainly
>> > >> cause
>> > >> >  problems, because
>> > >> >  tabs might be changed into spaces
>> (which
>> > is
>> > >> exactly what
>> > >> >  was
>> > >> >  causing patch to fail for me today).
>> > >> >  Oza: yes I am using copy-paste....I
>> dont
>> > know
>> > >> any-other way.
>> > >> > because attachmenet are not welcome, so
>> I am
>> > not sure
>> > >> how I could proceed with this.
>> > >>
>> > >> It's not that attachments are not welcome.
>> > >> There are various binary encodings for
>> > attachments, and
>> > >> some of those binary encodings are not
>> welcome.
>> > I
>> > >> think
>> > >> because there's no open-source way of
>> decoding
>> > them.
>> > >>
>> > >> If you look at the list, you'll see that
>> > attachments are
>> > >> used a lot.
>> > >>
>> > >> Copy-and-paste, though, in general will not
>> work,
>> > because
>> > >> it
>> > >> usually changes tabs into spaces, which ruins
>> a
>> > patch.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> > I will send you updated patch.....may be
>> I
>> > might have
>> > >> mistaken of old gdb file. sorry for
>> incovenience.
>> > >>
>> > >> I think it was just the tabs-to-spaces
>> issue.
>> > >> Why don't you try sending an attachment from
>> > Opera?
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>