Re: final i386.floating.record.patch

paawan oza
2009-07-30T16:54:35Z

Hi,

please find my answers below.

1) Are you using a Windows machine to send your
emails? If so,
is it possible that there is a Unix/Linux machine you could
try
sending from? Your attachments look OK for me, but
some people
seem to have had problems with them.

Oza : I used to send all from windows till now.
but this patch I sent it from Linux...from opera.

2) And are you using cut-and-paste to insert the patches
into the
body of your email? That would certainly cause
problems, because
tabs might be changed into spaces (which is exactly what
was
causing patch to fail for me today).

Oza: yes I am using copy-paste....I dont know any-other way.
because attachmenet are not welcome, so I am not sure how I could proceed with this.

I will send you updated patch.....may be I might have mistaken of old gdb file. sorry for incovenience.

Regards,
Oza.

>

--- On Thu, 7/30/09, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:

> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
> Subject: Re: final i386.floating.record.patch
> To: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 6:03 AM
> Michael Snyder wrote:
> > paawan oza wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Now the format is modified, and I am submitting
> the patch, I hope this meets the expectations.
> >> thank you all for your review comments specially
> Micahel and Hui.
> >> please find the patch as follows.
> >
> > I'm sorry, Oza, but the patch does not apply.
> >
> > bash-3.00$ patch <
> ~/oza3/i386.floating.record.patch.txt
> > patching file i386-tdep.c
> > Hunk #3 succeeded at 4249 with fuzz 1.
> > Hunk #4 FAILED at 4263.
> > Hunk #5 FAILED at 4321.
> > Hunk #6 FAILED at 4330.
> > Hunk #7 FAILED at 4351.
> > Hunk #8 FAILED at 4362.
> > Hunk #9 FAILED at 4414.
> > Hunk #10 FAILED at 4451.
> > Hunk #11 FAILED at 4470.
> > Hunk #12 FAILED at 4489.
> > Hunk #13 FAILED at 5110.
> > 10 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> i386-tdep.c.rej
>
> Just thinking about it -- this was the first time that I
> had
> trouble applying one of your patches.  But I
> remembered that
> previously, I always applied your patch from the
> attachment.
> This time there was no attachment, so I saved the email
> message
> and edited out the email headers.
>
> I know you've had a lot of trouble with attachments and
> patches
> not applying -- I'd like to get it sorted out if possible.
>
1) Are you using a Windows machine to send your
emails?  If so,
is it possible that there is a Unix/Linux machine you could
try
sending from?  Your attachments look OK for me, but
some people
seem to have had problems with them.

2) And are you using cut-and-paste to insert the patches
into the
body of your email?  That would certainly cause
problems, because
tabs might be changed into spaces (which is exactly what
was
causing patch to fail for me today).

>