Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

Even if you think i386 need this register, it should not be the part
of process record patch.
You can send a patch to make i386 support this register first.

Hui

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 22:59, paawan oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> yes. I know.
> I clarified that i386 also need FTAG, FSTATUS, FCTRL, registers...
> I am also waiting for the clarification from Mark.
> Regards,
> Oza.
>
> --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
>> To: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 1:15 PM
>> I had post my idea about your patch
>> in before.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 15:37, paawan oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Hui,
>> > Have you/any-body reviewed floating point patch ?
>> > I am waiting for the review comments, and also the
>> clarification from Mark.
>> > please reply.
>> > Regards,
>> > Oza.
>> >
>> > --- On Fri, 6/5/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> >> Subject: Re: Submition of
>> i386.record.floating.point.patch
>> >> To: "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
>> >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
>> paawan1982@yahoo.com
>> >> Date: Friday, June 5, 2009, 8:28 AM
>> >> That is great.  Thanks Mark.
>> >>
>> >> Hui
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:56, Mark Kettenis<mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:50:25 +0800
>> >> >> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Could someone help us about this?
>> >> >
>> >> > I should be able to, but I'm currently
>> travelling.
>> >>  Should be back next week.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>