From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-64447-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24597 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2009 05:19:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 24585 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2009 05:19:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-px0-f196.google.com (HELO mail-px0-f196.google.com) (209.85.216.196)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 05:19:43 +0000
Received: by pxi34 with SMTP id 34so1155381pxi.12         for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.212.21 with SMTP id k21mr1195113wfg.250.1244783981634;  	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <277482.46742.qm@web36203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <277482.46742.qm@web36203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 05:19:00 -0000
Message-ID: <daef60380906112219m3c2f5453w7fdcd29066fbe3e6@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
To: paawan oza <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00334.txt.bz2

Even if you think i386 need this register, it should not be the part
of process record patch.
You can send a patch to make i386 support this register first.

Hui

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 22:59, paawan oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> yes. I know.
> I clarified that i386 also need FTAG, FSTATUS, FCTRL, registers...
> I am also waiting for the clarification from Mark.
> Regards,
> Oza.
>
> --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
>> To: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 1:15 PM
>> I had post my idea about your patch
>> in before.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 15:37, paawan oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Hui,
>> > Have you/any-body reviewed floating point patch ?
>> > I am waiting for the review comments, and also the
>> clarification from Mark.
>> > please reply.
>> > Regards,
>> > Oza.
>> >
>> > --- On Fri, 6/5/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> >> Subject: Re: Submition of
>> i386.record.floating.point.patch
>> >> To: "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
>> >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
>> paawan1982@yahoo.com
>> >> Date: Friday, June 5, 2009, 8:28 AM
>> >> That is great.=A0 Thanks Mark.
>> >>
>> >> Hui
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:56, Mark Kettenis<mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:50:25 +0800
>> >> >> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Could someone help us about this?
>> >> >
>> >> > I should be able to, but I'm currently
>> travelling.
>> >> =A0Should be back next week.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>