Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch

[paawan oza <paawan1982@yahoo.com>]

Hi Hui,

I have already clarified the things.

1 -> all floating point registers (such as FTAG, FCTRL, FSTATUS) are required to record because of insn such as (FFREE)
2 -> gdb already has a support of all the FPU registers including FTAG, FSTATUS, FCTRL etc...

more importantly, patch works and properly tested with with all possible scenerios.
I am eagerly waiting for the patch's acceptance by gdb community : )

please do the needful, If you have any specific sugestion ple4ase elaborate and I will definately improve upon it.
please respond.

Regards,
Oza.



> --- On Fri, 6/12/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: Submition of
> i386.record.floating.point.patch
> > To: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> > Cc: "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
> gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 10:49 AM
> > Even if you think i386 need this
> > register, it should not be the part
> > of process record patch.
> > You can send a patch to make i386 support this
> register
> > first.
> > 
> > Hui
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 22:59, paawan oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > yes. I know.
> > > I clarified that i386 also need FTAG, FSTATUS,
> FCTRL,
> > registers...
> > > I am also waiting for the clarification from
> Mark.
> > > Regards,
> > > Oza.
> > >
> > > --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > >> Subject: Re: Submition of
> > i386.record.floating.point.patch
> > >> To: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> > >> Cc: "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
> > gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > >> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 1:15 PM
> > >> I had post my idea about your patch
> > >> in before.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Hui
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 15:37, paawan
> oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi Hui,
> > >> > Have you/any-body reviewed floating
> point
> > patch ?
> > >> > I am waiting for the review comments,
> and
> > also the
> > >> clarification from Mark.
> > >> > please reply.
> > >> > Regards,
> > >> > Oza.
> > >> >
> > >> > --- On Fri, 6/5/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > >> >> Subject: Re: Submition of
> > >> i386.record.floating.point.patch
> > >> >> To: "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> > >> >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
> > >> paawan1982@yahoo.com
> > >> >> Date: Friday, June 5, 2009, 8:28 AM
> > >> >> That is great.  Thanks Mark.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Hui
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:56, Mark
> > Kettenis<mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009
> 10:50:25
> > +0800
> > >> >> >> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Could someone help us
> about
> > this?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I should be able to, but I'm
> > currently
> > >> travelling.
> > >> >>  Should be back next week.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>