From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7833 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2009 15:04:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 7489 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2009 15:04:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_33 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from web36207.mail.mud.yahoo.com (HELO web36207.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.68.233) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:04:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 73057 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Jun 2009 15:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <524532.72990.qm@web36207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [123.237.140.76] by web36207.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:04:00 PDT Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:04:00 -0000 From: paawan oza Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch To: Hui Zhu Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00385.txt.bz2 Hi Hui, I have already clarified the things. 1 -> all floating point registers (such as FTAG, FCTRL, FSTATUS) are requir= ed to record because of insn such as (FFREE) 2 -> gdb already has a support of all the FPU registers including FTAG, FST= ATUS, FCTRL etc... more importantly, patch works and properly tested with with all possible sc= enerios. I am eagerly waiting for the patch's acceptance by gdb community : ) please do the needful, If you have any specific sugestion ple4ase elaborate= and I will definately improve upon it. please respond. Regards, Oza. > --- On Fri, 6/12/09, Hui Zhu > wrote: >=20 > > From: Hui Zhu > > Subject: Re: Submition of > i386.record.floating.point.patch > > To: "paawan oza" > > Cc: "Mark Kettenis" , > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 10:49 AM > > Even if you think i386 need this > > register, it should not be the part > > of process record patch. > > You can send a patch to make i386 support this > register > > first. > >=20 > > Hui > >=20 > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 22:59, paawan oza > > wrote: > > > > > > yes. I know. > > > I clarified that i386 also need FTAG, FSTATUS, > FCTRL, > > registers... > > > I am also waiting for the clarification from > Mark. > > > Regards, > > > Oza. > > > > > > --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Hui Zhu > > wrote: > > > > > >> From: Hui Zhu > > >> Subject: Re: Submition of > > i386.record.floating.point.patch > > >> To: "paawan oza" > > >> Cc: "Mark Kettenis" , > > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > >> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 1:15 PM > > >> I had post my idea about your patch > > >> in before. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Hui > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 15:37, paawan > oza > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Hi Hui, > > >> > Have you/any-body reviewed floating > point > > patch ? > > >> > I am waiting for the review comments, > and > > also the > > >> clarification from Mark. > > >> > please reply. > > >> > Regards, > > >> > Oza. > > >> > > > >> > --- On Fri, 6/5/09, Hui Zhu > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> From: Hui Zhu > > >> >> Subject: Re: Submition of > > >> i386.record.floating.point.patch > > >> >> To: "Mark Kettenis" > > >> >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, > > >> paawan1982@yahoo.com > > >> >> Date: Friday, June 5, 2009, 8:28 AM > > >> >> That is great.=A0 Thanks Mark. > > >> >> > > >> >> Hui > > >> >> > > >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:56, Mark > > Kettenis > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 > 10:50:25 > > +0800 > > >> >> >> From: Hui Zhu > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Could someone help us > about > > this? > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I should be able to, but I'm > > currently > > >> travelling. > > >> >> =A0Should be back next week. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20