Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Cc: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>,
	 	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix reverse-debug recursion function tail bug
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <daef60380906081918o4ec978e8wf20abe1e1a1a02f0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380905110007q6f0e716cw4dcc894461999f70@mail.gmail.com>

PING

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 15:07, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> PING
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 15:23, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Like the prev patch I send to you, this issue still affect cvs-head
>> and the patch can fix it.
>> Please help me review it.
>>
>> The attachment is the new patch follow cvs-head.
>>
>> 2009-05-06  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>>
>>       * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Check frame_id when
>>       check range in reverse debug mode.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 16:52, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch is for bug report by Marc in
>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-03/msg00127.html.
>>>
>>> This bug in "handle_inferior_event" deal with recursion function tail
>>> in reverse debug.
>>> infrun: infwait_normal_state
>>> infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED
>>> infrun: stop_pc = 0x8048457
>>> infrun: stepping inside range [0x8048457-0x804845a]
>>> infrun: stop_stepping
>>> factorial (x=4) at b.cc:5
>>>
>>> Inferior already step into another frame. But because this is a
>>> recursion function call, And 0x8048457 is in
>>> ecs->event_thread->step_range_start and
>>> ecs->event_thread->step_range_start.
>>>
>>> So gdb run in:
>>>
>>> if (stop_pc >= ecs->event_thread->step_range_start
>>>      && stop_pc < ecs->event_thread->step_range_end)
>>>    {
>>>
>>> This code is in front of:
>>>  if (!frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (get_current_frame ()),
>>>                    ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id)
>>>      && (frame_id_eq (frame_unwind_id (get_current_frame ()),
>>>                       ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id)
>>>          || execution_direction == EXEC_REVERSE))
>>>
>>> So gdb check range without check frame_id.
>>>
>>> So I make a patch to check frame_id when check range in reverse debug mode.
>>>
>>> 2008-03-21  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>        * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Check frame_id when
>>>        check range in reverse debug mode.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, there is another thing, when gdb begin reverse-debug, it's range is:
>>>  8048439:       8b 45 08                mov    0x8(%ebp),%eax
>>>  804843c:       83 e8 01                sub    $0x1,%eax
>>>  804843f:       89 04 24                mov    %eax,(%esp)
>>>  8048442:       e8 dd ff ff ff          call   8048424 <_Z9factoriali>
>>>  8048447:       0f af 45 08             imul   0x8(%ebp),%eax
>>>  804844b:       89 45 fc                mov    %eax,-0x4(%ebp)
>>> Why is changed to infrun: stepping inside range [0x8048457-0x804845a]?
>>> That is because when inferior step at:
>>>  8048458:       c3                      ret
>>> In this address, $ebp is same with high level function and this
>>> function is factorial too.
>>> So the gdb can't found inferior step into another frame.  It will run to:
>>>  ecs->event_thread->step_range_start = stop_pc_sal.pc;
>>>  ecs->event_thread->step_range_end = stop_pc_sal.end;
>>>  ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id = get_frame_id (get_current_frame ());
>>>  ecs->event_thread->current_line = stop_pc_sal.line;
>>>  ecs->event_thread->current_symtab = stop_pc_sal.symtab;
>>>
>>>  if (debug_infrun)
>>>     fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "infrun: keep going\n");
>>>  keep_going (ecs);
>>> }
>>> So ecs->event_thread->step_range_start and ecs->event_thread->step_range_end.
>>>
>>> I don't find that it affect the reverse debug or something.  So I didn't fix it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hui
>>>
>>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-09  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-21  9:17 Hui Zhu
2009-05-06  7:24 ` Hui Zhu
2009-05-11  7:07   ` Hui Zhu
2009-06-09  2:18     ` Hui Zhu [this message]
2009-06-15  0:55       ` Michael Snyder
2009-06-15  3:37         ` Hui Zhu
2009-06-15 15:06           ` Marc Khouzam
2009-06-15 18:03             ` Michael Snyder
2009-06-18 23:56               ` Michael Snyder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=daef60380906081918o4ec978e8wf20abe1e1a1a02f0@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=teawater@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
    --cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox