From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Cc: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix reverse-debug recursion function tail bug
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 07:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <daef60380905060023j6ea70448wf93cd9c114954d94@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380903210152m3c0f5470o39b5d5246f245781@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3252 bytes --]
Hi Michael,
Like the prev patch I send to you, this issue still affect cvs-head
and the patch can fix it.
Please help me review it.
The attachment is the new patch follow cvs-head.
2009-05-06 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
* infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Check frame_id when
check range in reverse debug mode.
Thanks,
Hui
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 16:52, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch is for bug report by Marc in
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-03/msg00127.html.
>
> This bug in "handle_inferior_event" deal with recursion function tail
> in reverse debug.
> infrun: infwait_normal_state
> infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED
> infrun: stop_pc = 0x8048457
> infrun: stepping inside range [0x8048457-0x804845a]
> infrun: stop_stepping
> factorial (x=4) at b.cc:5
>
> Inferior already step into another frame. But because this is a
> recursion function call, And 0x8048457 is in
> ecs->event_thread->step_range_start and
> ecs->event_thread->step_range_start.
>
> So gdb run in:
>
> if (stop_pc >= ecs->event_thread->step_range_start
> && stop_pc < ecs->event_thread->step_range_end)
> {
>
> This code is in front of:
> if (!frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (get_current_frame ()),
> ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id)
> && (frame_id_eq (frame_unwind_id (get_current_frame ()),
> ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id)
> || execution_direction == EXEC_REVERSE))
>
> So gdb check range without check frame_id.
>
> So I make a patch to check frame_id when check range in reverse debug mode.
>
> 2008-03-21 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>
> * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Check frame_id when
> check range in reverse debug mode.
>
>
>
>
>
> Actually, there is another thing, when gdb begin reverse-debug, it's range is:
> 8048439: 8b 45 08 mov 0x8(%ebp),%eax
> 804843c: 83 e8 01 sub $0x1,%eax
> 804843f: 89 04 24 mov %eax,(%esp)
> 8048442: e8 dd ff ff ff call 8048424 <_Z9factoriali>
> 8048447: 0f af 45 08 imul 0x8(%ebp),%eax
> 804844b: 89 45 fc mov %eax,-0x4(%ebp)
> Why is changed to infrun: stepping inside range [0x8048457-0x804845a]?
> That is because when inferior step at:
> 8048458: c3 ret
> In this address, $ebp is same with high level function and this
> function is factorial too.
> So the gdb can't found inferior step into another frame. It will run to:
> ecs->event_thread->step_range_start = stop_pc_sal.pc;
> ecs->event_thread->step_range_end = stop_pc_sal.end;
> ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id = get_frame_id (get_current_frame ());
> ecs->event_thread->current_line = stop_pc_sal.line;
> ecs->event_thread->current_symtab = stop_pc_sal.symtab;
>
> if (debug_infrun)
> fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "infrun: keep going\n");
> keep_going (ecs);
> }
> So ecs->event_thread->step_range_start and ecs->event_thread->step_range_end.
>
> I don't find that it affect the reverse debug or something. So I didn't fix it.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
[-- Attachment #2: fix-function-tail-stack-same.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 695 bytes --]
---
infrun.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/infrun.c
+++ b/infrun.c
@@ -3421,7 +3421,10 @@ infrun: BPSTAT_WHAT_SET_LONGJMP_RESUME (
beyond the step range, and NOT the address of the last instruction
within it! */
if (stop_pc >= ecs->event_thread->step_range_start
- && stop_pc < ecs->event_thread->step_range_end)
+ && stop_pc < ecs->event_thread->step_range_end
+ && (frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (get_current_frame ()),
+ ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id)
+ || execution_direction != EXEC_REVERSE))
{
if (debug_infrun)
fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "infrun: stepping inside range [0x%s-0x%s]\n",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-06 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-21 9:17 Hui Zhu
2009-05-06 7:24 ` Hui Zhu [this message]
2009-05-11 7:07 ` Hui Zhu
2009-06-09 2:18 ` Hui Zhu
2009-06-15 0:55 ` Michael Snyder
2009-06-15 3:37 ` Hui Zhu
2009-06-15 15:06 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-06-15 18:03 ` Michael Snyder
2009-06-18 23:56 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=daef60380905060023j6ea70448wf93cd9c114954d94@mail.gmail.com \
--to=teawater@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
--cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox