From: "Marc Khouzam" <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
To: "Hui Zhu" <teawater@gmail.com>, "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@vmware.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [RFA] Patch to fix reverse-debug recursion function tail bug
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA0797603A@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380906142036q560927d2k1584331f8627fc69@mail.gmail.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hui Zhu [mailto:teawater@gmail.com]
> Sent: June-14-09 11:37 PM
> To: Michael Snyder; Marc Khouzam
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix reverse-debug recursion
> function tail bug
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 08:55, Michael
> Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
> > Hui Zhu wrote:
> >>
> >> PING
> >
> > Thanks for the reminder.
> >
> > I added some comment and changed the order of evaluation a bit,
> > hoping to reduce the performance impact on normal debugging.
> > And I ran the testsuites, before and after.
> >
> > Modified patch is attached -- is this OK with you guys?
> > Mark, can you confirm that it fixes your original bug?
> >
>
> This patch is OK with me.
> Marc, what do you think about it?
I tested before and after the patch and it does fix
the problem for me.
Thanks!
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
>
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 15:07, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> PING
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 15:23, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Michael,
> >>>>
> >>>> Like the prev patch I send to you, this issue still
> affect cvs-head
> >>>> and the patch can fix it.
> >>>> Please help me review it.
> >>>>
> >>>> The attachment is the new patch follow cvs-head.
> >>>>
> >>>> 2009-05-06 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Check frame_id when
> >>>> check range in reverse debug mode.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Hui
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 16:52, Hui Zhu
> <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This patch is for bug report by Marc in
> >>>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-03/msg00127.html.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This bug in "handle_inferior_event" deal with recursion
> function tail
> >>>>> in reverse debug.
> >>>>> infrun: infwait_normal_state
> >>>>> infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED
> >>>>> infrun: stop_pc = 0x8048457
> >>>>> infrun: stepping inside range [0x8048457-0x804845a]
> >>>>> infrun: stop_stepping
> >>>>> factorial (x=4) at b.cc:5
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Inferior already step into another frame. But because this is a
> >>>>> recursion function call, And 0x8048457 is in
> >>>>> ecs->event_thread->step_range_start and
> >>>>> ecs->event_thread->step_range_start.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So gdb run in:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (stop_pc >= ecs->event_thread->step_range_start
> >>>>> && stop_pc < ecs->event_thread->step_range_end)
> >>>>> {
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This code is in front of:
> >>>>> if (!frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (get_current_frame ()),
> >>>>> ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id)
> >>>>> && (frame_id_eq (frame_unwind_id (get_current_frame ()),
> >>>>> ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id)
> >>>>> || execution_direction == EXEC_REVERSE))
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So gdb check range without check frame_id.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So I make a patch to check frame_id when check range in
> reverse debug
> >>>>> mode.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2008-03-21 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Check frame_id when
> >>>>> check range in reverse debug mode.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Actually, there is another thing, when gdb begin
> reverse-debug, it's
> >>>>> range is:
> >>>>> 8048439: 8b 45 08 mov 0x8(%ebp),%eax
> >>>>> 804843c: 83 e8 01 sub $0x1,%eax
> >>>>> 804843f: 89 04 24 mov %eax,(%esp)
> >>>>> 8048442: e8 dd ff ff ff call 8048424
> <_Z9factoriali>
> >>>>> 8048447: 0f af 45 08 imul 0x8(%ebp),%eax
> >>>>> 804844b: 89 45 fc mov %eax,-0x4(%ebp)
> >>>>> Why is changed to infrun: stepping inside range
> [0x8048457-0x804845a]?
> >>>>> That is because when inferior step at:
> >>>>> 8048458: c3 ret
> >>>>> In this address, $ebp is same with high level function and this
> >>>>> function is factorial too.
> >>>>> So the gdb can't found inferior step into another
> frame. It will run
> >>>>> to:
> >>>>> ecs->event_thread->step_range_start = stop_pc_sal.pc;
> >>>>> ecs->event_thread->step_range_end = stop_pc_sal.end;
> >>>>> ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id = get_frame_id
> (get_current_frame
> >>>>> ());
> >>>>> ecs->event_thread->current_line = stop_pc_sal.line;
> >>>>> ecs->event_thread->current_symtab = stop_pc_sal.symtab;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (debug_infrun)
> >>>>> fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "infrun: keep going\n");
> >>>>> keep_going (ecs);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> So ecs->event_thread->step_range_start and
> >>>>> ecs->event_thread->step_range_end.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I don't find that it affect the reverse debug or
> something. So I
> >>>>> didn't fix it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Hui
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > 2009-06-14 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
> >
> > * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Improve reverse stepping
> > through function epilogue.
> >
> > Index: infrun.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/infrun.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.387
> > diff -u -p -r1.387 infrun.c
> > --- infrun.c 11 Jun 2009 11:57:46 -0000 1.387
> > +++ infrun.c 15 Jun 2009 00:45:17 -0000
> > @@ -3623,9 +3623,17 @@ infrun: not switching back to stepped th
> >
> > Note that step_range_end is the address of the first
> instruction
> > beyond the step range, and NOT the address of the last
> instruction
> > - within it! */
> > + within it!
> > +
> > + Note also that during reverse execution, we may be stepping
> > + through a function epilogue and therefore must detect when
> > + the current-frame changes in the middle of a line. */
> > +
> > if (stop_pc >= ecs->event_thread->step_range_start
> > - && stop_pc < ecs->event_thread->step_range_end)
> > + && stop_pc < ecs->event_thread->step_range_end
> > + && (execution_direction != EXEC_REVERSE
> > + || frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (get_current_frame ()),
> > + ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id)))
> > {
> > if (debug_infrun)
> > fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "infrun: stepping
> inside range
> > [0x%s-0x%s]\n",
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-15 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-21 9:17 Hui Zhu
2009-05-06 7:24 ` Hui Zhu
2009-05-11 7:07 ` Hui Zhu
2009-06-09 2:18 ` Hui Zhu
2009-06-15 0:55 ` Michael Snyder
2009-06-15 3:37 ` Hui Zhu
2009-06-15 15:06 ` Marc Khouzam [this message]
2009-06-15 18:03 ` Michael Snyder
2009-06-18 23:56 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA0797603A@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se \
--to=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=teawater@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox