Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
	 	marc.khouzam@ericsson.com, msnyder@vmware.com,
	bauerman@br.ibm.com,  	eliz@gnu.org, paawan1982@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 7/8
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <daef60380903220859h28af500bl14d8be4ce43e8f5c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903221530.52997.pedro@codesourcery.com>

Hi Pedro,

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 23:30, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> The way this is written looks like there's a bunch
> of unneeded duplication.
>
>  +#define I386_LINUX_RECORD_SIZE__old_kernel_stat        32
>
>  +  /* Initialize the i386_linux_record_tdep.  */
>  +  i386_linux_record_tdep.size__old_kernel_stat =
>  +    I386_LINUX_RECORD_SIZE__old_kernel_stat;
>
> Are the I386_LINUX_RECORD_SIZE__XXXXX defines used for
> anything else other than initializing the corresponding
> i386_linux_record_tdep.size_XXXXX field?  If not, why not
> drop the defines and just write
>
>  i386_linux_record_tdep.size__old_kernel_stat = 32;

Yes, you are right.  I will do it.

>
> ?
>
> Personally, I think that stamping everything with "record" in
> its name is a mistake.  This is about the linux syscall abi,
> could be reused for something else...
>

About this part, we have a discussion in
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00171.html
We will make it better later.


Thanks,
Hui


  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-22 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-21 16:05 Hui Zhu
2009-03-21 16:23 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-03-22 14:55   ` Hui Zhu
2009-03-22 15:37     ` Pedro Alves
2009-03-22 16:43       ` Hui Zhu [this message]
2009-03-22 16:47         ` Hui Zhu
2009-03-22 17:01           ` Pedro Alves
2009-03-22 17:10             ` Hui Zhu
2009-03-22 17:32               ` Pedro Alves
2009-03-22 23:52                 ` Hui Zhu
2009-03-22 21:53             ` Mark Kettenis
2009-03-23  2:12               ` Hui Zhu
2009-04-15 17:10 ` Hui Zhu
2009-04-28 10:05   ` Hui Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=daef60380903220859h28af500bl14d8be4ce43e8f5c@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=teawater@gmail.com \
    --cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=paawan1982@yahoo.com \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox