From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
To: "Pedro Alves" <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@vmware.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <daef60380810202351h3d16174cl7be16a9767e413ad@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810210121.07914.pedro@codesourcery.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1752 bytes --]
Sorry for understand your mean so later Pedro. I made a new patch that
Set pc if forward execute and gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break is not 0 in
replay mode. How do you think about it?
And I think 20080930 branch is need your "adjust_pc_reverse.diff". Do
you mind I check it in?
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:21, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 October 2008 00:36:12, teawater wrote:
>> I think your mean is check breakpoint in address
>> read_pc()+gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break (gdbarch) in record_wait, right?
>
> Taking x86 as an example, when you're doing normal debugging and you
> hit a breakpoint (SIGTRAP), the first read_pc GDB does to check where
> what breakpoint was hit, will read back `breakpoint_PC + 1' --- GDB takes care
> getting rid of that `+ 1' offset in infrun.c:adjust_pc_after_break. The
> idea is for you to do the same as the kernel/hardware would --- still
> check for breakpoints at read_pc, but increment PC by 1 before reporting the
> breakpoint to GDB's core. E.g., see the `pc += gdbarch...' line from
> the patch I posted previously, something like:
>
> record.c:record_wait ()
> {
> ...
> + /* Check for breakpoint hits in forward execution. */
> + pc = read_pc ();
> + if (execution_direction == EXEC_FORWARD
> + && regular_breakpoint_inserted_here_p (pc)
> + /* && !single-stepping */)
> + {
> + status->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED;
> + status->value.sig = TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP;
> + if (software_breakpoint_inserted_here_p (pc))
> + {
> + pc += gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break (gdbarch);
> + write_pc (pc);
> + }
> +
>
> --
> Pedro Alves
>
[-- Attachment #2: record_wait_breakpoint.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2821 bytes --]
--- a/record.c
+++ b/record.c
@@ -497,6 +497,30 @@ record_wait (ptid_t ptid, struct target_
int continue_flag = 1;
int first_record_end = 1;
struct cleanup *old_cleanups = make_cleanup (record_wait_cleanups, 0);
+ CORE_ADDR tmp_pc;
+
+ /* Check breakpoint when forward execute. */
+ if (execution_direction == EXEC_FORWARD)
+ {
+ tmp_pc = regcache_read_pc (regcache);
+ if (breakpoint_inserted_here_p (tmp_pc))
+ {
+ if (record_debug)
+ {
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
+ "Process record: break at 0x%s.\n",
+ paddr_nz (tmp_pc));
+ }
+ if (gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break (get_regcache_arch (regcache)))
+ {
+ regcache_write_pc (regcache,
+ tmp_pc +
+ gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break
+ (get_regcache_arch (regcache)));
+ }
+ goto replay_out;
+ }
+ }
record_get_sig = 0;
act.sa_handler = record_sig_handler;
@@ -588,10 +612,6 @@ record_wait (ptid_t ptid, struct target_
}
else
{
- CORE_ADDR tmp_pc;
- struct bp_location *bl;
- struct breakpoint *b;
-
if (record_debug > 1)
{
fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
@@ -632,35 +652,24 @@ record_wait (ptid_t ptid, struct target_
}
/* check breakpoint */
- tmp_pc = read_pc ();
- for (bl = bp_location_chain; bl; bl = bl->global_next)
+ tmp_pc = regcache_read_pc (regcache);
+ if (breakpoint_inserted_here_p (tmp_pc))
{
- b = bl->owner;
- gdb_assert (b);
- if (b->enable_state != bp_enabled
- && b->enable_state != bp_permanent)
- continue;
-
- if (b->type == bp_watchpoint || b->type == bp_catch_fork
- || b->type == bp_catch_vfork
- || b->type == bp_catch_exec
- || b->type == bp_hardware_watchpoint
- || b->type == bp_read_watchpoint
- || b->type == bp_access_watchpoint)
+ if (record_debug)
{
- continue;
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
+ "Process record: break at 0x%s.\n",
+ paddr_nz (tmp_pc));
}
- if (bl->address == tmp_pc)
+ if (gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break (get_regcache_arch (regcache))
+ && execution_direction == EXEC_FORWARD)
{
- if (record_debug)
- {
- fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
- "Process record: break at 0x%s.\n",
- paddr_nz (tmp_pc));
- }
- continue_flag = 0;
- break;
+ regcache_write_pc (regcache,
+ tmp_pc +
+ gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break
+ (get_regcache_arch (regcache)));
}
+ continue_flag = 0;
}
}
if (execution_direction == EXEC_REVERSE)
@@ -691,6 +700,7 @@ next:
perror_with_name (_("Process record: sigaction"));
}
+replay_out:
if (record_get_sig)
{
status->value.sig = TARGET_SIGNAL_INT;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-21 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-18 1:11 Pedro Alves
2008-10-18 1:26 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-18 3:09 ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-18 3:18 ` teawater
2008-10-18 8:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-10-19 14:28 ` teawater
2008-10-19 20:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-18 3:07 ` teawater
2008-10-18 3:26 ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-19 22:44 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-20 0:10 ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-20 0:44 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-20 1:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-20 12:10 ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-20 15:50 ` teawater
2008-10-20 17:44 ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-20 17:51 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-20 23:36 ` teawater
2008-10-21 0:21 ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-21 0:56 ` teawater
2008-10-21 3:13 ` teawater
2008-10-21 6:52 ` teawater [this message]
2008-10-21 6:52 ` teawater
2008-10-23 23:28 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-21 7:04 ` teawater
2008-10-21 18:36 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-22 0:39 ` teawater
2008-10-23 23:32 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-23 23:46 ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-23 23:55 ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-24 0:45 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-24 0:43 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-24 1:51 ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-24 8:11 ` teawater
2008-10-24 9:58 ` teawater
2008-10-25 7:08 ` teawater
2008-10-28 3:21 ` teawater
2008-10-29 1:24 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-30 3:01 ` teawater
2008-10-30 12:21 ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-30 22:06 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-30 21:44 ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-30 21:29 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-31 13:04 ` teawater
2008-10-31 0:25 ` teawater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=daef60380810202351h3d16174cl7be16a9767e413ad@mail.gmail.com \
--to=teawater@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox