Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>,
	  "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48FE1FE0.7040803@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380810210003v3a1b366o8d9b142c46f19c69@mail.gmail.com>

teawater wrote:
> Sorry I send too much Email. I found that:
> 
>       if (singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p
>           || !ptid_equal (ecs->ptid, inferior_ptid)
>           || !currently_stepping (ecs->event_thread)
>           || ecs->event_thread->prev_pc == breakpoint_pc)
>         regcache_write_pc (regcache, breakpoint_pc);
> 
> Before write_pc, there are a lot of thing to check. Do we  need to
> check it in record_wait?
> If so, it actually useless cause it will be set back in adjust_pc_after_break?
> Maybe we can let adjust_pc_after_break disable in replay mode.
> 
> How do you think?

I think we should leave adjust_pc_after_break alone,
and change record_wait so that it adjusts the pc by
adding decr_pc_after_break(gdbarch) when appropriate.

Whenever possible, gdb should not need to know the difference
between replay and live debugging.  This keeps things simple,
and preserves modularity.

Of course, you don't have access to the "ecs" object, which
is local to infrun.  But you do know whether or not gdb is
stepping.  And (for now) you know that there is only one
thread, so you can (for now) ignore the thread id (ptid).

The value of "step" that was passed to record_resume
came from "currently_stepping", so you should be able
to use that.

Something close to the patch that Pedro posted should work...




  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-21 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-18  1:11 Pedro Alves
2008-10-18  1:26 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-18  3:09   ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-18  3:18     ` teawater
2008-10-18  8:42     ` Andreas Schwab
2008-10-19 14:28       ` teawater
2008-10-19 20:10     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-18  3:07 ` teawater
2008-10-18  3:26   ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-19 22:44 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-20  0:10   ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-20  0:44     ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-20  1:46       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-20 12:10       ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-20 15:50         ` teawater
2008-10-20 17:44       ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-20 17:51         ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-20 23:36           ` teawater
2008-10-21  0:21             ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-21  0:56               ` teawater
2008-10-21  3:13                 ` teawater
2008-10-21  6:52               ` teawater
2008-10-21  6:52                 ` teawater
2008-10-23 23:28                 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-21  7:04               ` teawater
2008-10-21 18:36                 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2008-10-22  0:39                   ` teawater
2008-10-23 23:32     ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-23 23:46       ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-23 23:55         ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-24  0:45           ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-24  0:43         ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-24  1:51           ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-24  8:11             ` teawater
2008-10-24  9:58               ` teawater
2008-10-25  7:08                 ` teawater
2008-10-28  3:21                   ` teawater
2008-10-29  1:24                   ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-30  3:01                     ` teawater
2008-10-30 12:21                     ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-30 22:06                       ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-30 21:44                         ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-30 21:29                           ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-31 13:04                           ` teawater
2008-10-31  0:25                       ` teawater

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48FE1FE0.7040803@vmware.com \
    --to=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=teawater@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox