Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@vmware.com>,
	 "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [reverse/record] adjust_pc_after_break in reverse execution mode?
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810210121.07914.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380810201636g3aa0e935r55eedbac1457e9a1@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday 21 October 2008 00:36:12, teawater wrote:
> I think your mean is check breakpoint in address
> read_pc()+gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break (gdbarch) in record_wait, right?

Taking x86 as an example, when you're doing normal debugging and you
hit a breakpoint (SIGTRAP), the first read_pc GDB does to check where
what breakpoint was hit, will read back `breakpoint_PC + 1' --- GDB takes care
getting rid of that `+ 1' offset in infrun.c:adjust_pc_after_break.  The
idea is for you to do the same as the kernel/hardware would --- still
check for breakpoints at read_pc, but increment PC by 1 before reporting the
breakpoint to GDB's core.  E.g., see the `pc += gdbarch...' line from
the patch I posted previously, something like:

record.c:record_wait ()
{
...
+         /* Check for breakpoint hits in forward execution.  */
+         pc = read_pc ();
+         if (execution_direction == EXEC_FORWARD
+             && regular_breakpoint_inserted_here_p (pc)
+             /* && !single-stepping */)
+           {
+             status->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED;
+             status->value.sig = TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP;
+             if (software_breakpoint_inserted_here_p (pc))
+               {
+                 pc += gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break (gdbarch);
+                 write_pc (pc);
+               }
+

-- 
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-21  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-18  1:11 Pedro Alves
2008-10-18  1:26 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-18  3:09   ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-18  3:18     ` teawater
2008-10-18  8:42     ` Andreas Schwab
2008-10-19 14:28       ` teawater
2008-10-19 20:10     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-18  3:07 ` teawater
2008-10-18  3:26   ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-19 22:44 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-20  0:10   ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-20  0:44     ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-20  1:46       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-20 12:10       ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-20 15:50         ` teawater
2008-10-20 17:44       ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-20 17:51         ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-20 23:36           ` teawater
2008-10-21  0:21             ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2008-10-21  0:56               ` teawater
2008-10-21  3:13                 ` teawater
2008-10-21  6:52               ` teawater
2008-10-21  6:52                 ` teawater
2008-10-23 23:28                 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-21  7:04               ` teawater
2008-10-21 18:36                 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-22  0:39                   ` teawater
2008-10-23 23:32     ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-23 23:46       ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-23 23:55         ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-24  0:45           ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-24  0:43         ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-24  1:51           ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-24  8:11             ` teawater
2008-10-24  9:58               ` teawater
2008-10-25  7:08                 ` teawater
2008-10-28  3:21                   ` teawater
2008-10-29  1:24                   ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-30  3:01                     ` teawater
2008-10-30 12:21                     ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-30 22:06                       ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-30 21:44                         ` Pedro Alves
2008-10-30 21:29                           ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-31 13:04                           ` teawater
2008-10-31  0:25                       ` teawater

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200810210121.07914.pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=teawater@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox