From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
To: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>,
"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@vmware.com>,
"Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@false.org>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
"gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [reverse RFA] no singlestep-over-BP in reverse
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <daef60380809160835v528fb985qf33667fe39fbb143@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080916152159.GA23026@caradoc.them.org>
Maybe we can make user have more choices.
Of course, some of target can just support one choice.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 23:21, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:03:42PM +0800, teawater wrote:
>> 1. The instruction in this address already reverse executed, it make
>> program status back to before forward execute this instruction.
>
> I like this approach; I believe it's what we used in the qemu reverse
> implementation also. It means that you have the same state when
> you're pointing at the start of a source line: it has not yet executed.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-16 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-15 18:33 Michael Snyder
2008-09-15 18:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-15 19:07 ` Michael Snyder
2008-09-15 21:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-15 23:09 ` Michael Snyder
2008-09-16 0:09 ` Michael Snyder
2008-09-16 4:13 ` teawater
[not found] ` <daef60380809152110u663350abx76b283d519c5a09d@mail.gmail.com>
2008-09-16 18:40 ` Michael Snyder
2008-09-16 4:22 ` teawater
2008-09-16 15:04 ` teawater
2008-09-16 15:14 ` teawater
2008-09-16 15:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-16 15:34 ` teawater
2008-09-16 15:35 ` teawater [this message]
2008-09-16 18:50 ` Michael Snyder
2008-09-16 18:45 ` Michael Snyder
2008-09-16 20:11 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-17 0:56 ` Michael Snyder
2008-09-17 15:44 ` teawater
2008-09-17 18:18 ` Michael Snyder
2008-09-17 15:32 ` teawater
2008-09-17 18:16 ` Michael Snyder
2008-09-18 6:39 ` teawater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=daef60380809160835v528fb985qf33667fe39fbb143@mail.gmail.com \
--to=teawater@gmail.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox