From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11804 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2008 15:35:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 11764 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Sep 2008 15:35:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.191) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:35:17 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d10so1818754tib.12 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.47.17 with SMTP id u17mr1601787tiu.7.1221579314797; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.42.9 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:35:00 -0000 From: teawater To: teawater , "Michael Snyder" , "Daniel Jacobowitz" Subject: Re: [reverse RFA] no singlestep-over-BP in reverse Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "gdb@sourceware.org" In-Reply-To: <20080916152159.GA23026@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48CEAA05.8050006@vmware.com> <20080916152159.GA23026@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2 Maybe we can make user have more choices. Of course, some of target can just support one choice. On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 23:21, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:03:42PM +0800, teawater wrote: >> 1. The instruction in this address already reverse executed, it make >> program status back to before forward execute this instruction. > > I like this approach; I believe it's what we used in the qemu reverse > implementation also. It means that you have the same state when > you're pointing at the start of a source line: it has not yet executed. > > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > CodeSourcery >