Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.base/annota1.exp more robust
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:38:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1c39b8f-5181-dba0-42b5-df7c96aacaf5@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220405134732.GA32701@delia>

On 2022-04-05 09:47, Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On openSUSE Tumbleweed I run into:
> ...
> FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: run until main breakpoint (timeout)
> ...
> 
> The problem is that the libthread_db message occurs at a location where it's
> not expected:
> ...
> Starting program: outputs/gdb.base/annota1/annota1 ^M
> ^M
> ^Z^Zstarting^M
> ^M
> ^Z^Zframes-invalid^M
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]^M
> Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".^M
> ^M
> ^Z^Zbreakpoints-invalid^M
> ^M
> ...
> 
> Fix this by making the matching more robust:
> - rewrite the regexp such that each annotation is on a single line,
>   starting with \r\n\032\032 and ending with \r\n
> - add a regexp variable optional_re, that matches all possible optional
>   output, and use it as a separator in the first part of the regexp
> 
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> Thanks,
> - Tom

Hi Tom,

This introduces a failure on Ubuntu 20.04 and on Arch Linux.

    PASS: gdb.base/annota1.exp: breakpoint info
    run^M
    ^M
    ^Z^Zpost-prompt^M
    Starting program: /home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/annota1/annota1 ^M
    ^M
    ^Z^Zbreakpoints-invalid^M
    ^M
    ^Z^Zstarting^M
    ^M
    ^Z^Zframes-invalid^M
    ^M
    ^Z^Zbreakpoints-invalid^M
    ^M
    ^Z^Zbreakpoint 1^M
    ^M
    Breakpoint 1, ^M
    ^Z^Zframe-begin 0 0x555555555183^M
    ^M
    ^Z^Zframe-function-name^M
    main^M
    ^Z^Zframe-args^M
     ()^M
    ^Z^Zframe-source-begin^M
     at ^M
    ^Z^Zframe-source-file^M
    /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.c^M
    ^Z^Zframe-source-file-end^M
    :^M
    ^Z^Zframe-source-line^M
    15^M
    ^Z^Zframe-source-end^M
    ^M
    ^M
    ^Z^Zsource /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.c:15:103:beg:0x555555555183^M
    ^M
    ^Z^Zframe-end^M
    ^M
    ^Z^Zstopped^M
    ^M
    ^Z^Zpre-prompt^M
    (gdb) ^M
    ^Z^Zprompt^M
    FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: run until main breakpoint (timeout)

The issue is the now hardcoded order of "breakpoints-invalid" and
"frames-invalid" order in the test regexp, where the output happens in
the other order.  Before your change, we had:

	 "\(\(\r\n\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\)|\(\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\)\)*\r\n\r\n" \

Meaning we didn't care about the order of those, and we didn't care if
we saw them or not.  The change below moves those lines in optional_re,
and fixes things on my side.


From ce3aa014dc9739f2ccaccc6348b795ce1d86366a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:36:27 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] fix

Change-Id: I9ea90dd0d162764b5b6d395c033d73e4d096cf51
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp
index 40a13e7cf190..f7e108758b18 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp
@@ -23,8 +23,6 @@ if ![target_can_use_run_cmd] {
     return 0
 }
 
-set breakpoints_invalid "\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\r\n"
-
 #
 # test running programs
 #
@@ -140,6 +138,8 @@ set libthread_db_re \
     [multi_line \
 	 "\\\[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled\\\]" \
 	 "Using host libthread_db library \[^\r\n\]+\r\n"]
+set breakpoints_invalid_re "\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\r\n"
+set frames_invalid_re "\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\r\n"
 
 set optional_re \
     [list \
@@ -151,6 +151,10 @@ set optional_re \
 	 "\($libthread_db_re\)" \
 	 "|" \
 	 "\(\r\n$warning_gdb_index_re\)?" \
+	 "|" \
+	 "\($breakpoints_invalid_re\)" \
+	 "|" \
+	 "\($frames_invalid_re\)" \
 	 "\)*"]
 set optional_re [join $optional_re ""]
 
@@ -161,10 +165,6 @@ set run_re \
 	 $optional_re \
 	 "\r\n\032\032starting\r\n" \
 	 $optional_re \
-	 "\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\r\n" \
-	 $optional_re \
-	 "\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\r\n" \
-	 $optional_re \
 	 "\r\n\032\032breakpoint 1\r\n" \
 	 "\r\n" \
 	 "Breakpoint 1, " \
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ gdb_test_multiple "break printf" "break printf" {
 #
 # get to printf
 #
-set pat_begin "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\nContinuing.\r\n\r\n\032\032starting\r\n\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\r\n${breakpoints_invalid}\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\r\n"
+set pat_begin "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\nContinuing.\r\n\r\n\032\032starting\r\n\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\r\n${breakpoints_invalid_re}\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\r\n"
 set pat_adjust "warning: Breakpoint 3 address previously adjusted from $hex to $hex.\r\n"
 set pat_end "\r\n\032\032breakpoint 3\r\n\r\nBreakpoint 3, \r\n\032\032frame-begin 0 $hex\r\n\r\n(\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n)*.*\032\032frame-function-name\r\n.*printf(@.*)?\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n.*\032\032frame-end\r\n\r\n\032\032stopped\r\n$gdb_prompt$"
 
@@ -336,19 +336,19 @@ if [target_info exists gdb,nosignals] {
 # delete all the breakpoints
 #
 gdb_test_multiple "delete 1" "delete bp 1" {
-    -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n${breakpoints_invalid}$gdb_prompt$" {
+    -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n${breakpoints_invalid_re}$gdb_prompt$" {
 	pass $gdb_test_name
     }
 }
 
 gdb_test_multiple "delete 2" "delete bp 2" {
-    -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n${breakpoints_invalid}$gdb_prompt$" {
+    -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n${breakpoints_invalid_re}$gdb_prompt$" {
 	pass $gdb_test_name
     }
 }
 
 gdb_test_multiple "delete 3" "delete bp 3" {
-    -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n${breakpoints_invalid}$gdb_prompt$" {
+    -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n${breakpoints_invalid_re}$gdb_prompt$" {
 	pass $gdb_test_name
     }
 }

base-commit: 4f7df13ee75be36ae5c6046b6d6f60e04498b719
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-07 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-05 13:47 Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-04-07 14:10 ` Tom Tromey
2022-04-07 18:38 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2022-04-08  9:04   ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-04-11  8:43     ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-04-11 15:21       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d1c39b8f-5181-dba0-42b5-df7c96aacaf5@polymtl.ca \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox