From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.base/annota1.exp more robust
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:38:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1c39b8f-5181-dba0-42b5-df7c96aacaf5@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220405134732.GA32701@delia>
On 2022-04-05 09:47, Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On openSUSE Tumbleweed I run into:
> ...
> FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: run until main breakpoint (timeout)
> ...
>
> The problem is that the libthread_db message occurs at a location where it's
> not expected:
> ...
> Starting program: outputs/gdb.base/annota1/annota1 ^M
> ^M
> ^Z^Zstarting^M
> ^M
> ^Z^Zframes-invalid^M
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]^M
> Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".^M
> ^M
> ^Z^Zbreakpoints-invalid^M
> ^M
> ...
>
> Fix this by making the matching more robust:
> - rewrite the regexp such that each annotation is on a single line,
> starting with \r\n\032\032 and ending with \r\n
> - add a regexp variable optional_re, that matches all possible optional
> output, and use it as a separator in the first part of the regexp
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
>
> Any comments?
>
> Thanks,
> - Tom
Hi Tom,
This introduces a failure on Ubuntu 20.04 and on Arch Linux.
PASS: gdb.base/annota1.exp: breakpoint info
run^M
^M
^Z^Zpost-prompt^M
Starting program: /home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/annota1/annota1 ^M
^M
^Z^Zbreakpoints-invalid^M
^M
^Z^Zstarting^M
^M
^Z^Zframes-invalid^M
^M
^Z^Zbreakpoints-invalid^M
^M
^Z^Zbreakpoint 1^M
^M
Breakpoint 1, ^M
^Z^Zframe-begin 0 0x555555555183^M
^M
^Z^Zframe-function-name^M
main^M
^Z^Zframe-args^M
()^M
^Z^Zframe-source-begin^M
at ^M
^Z^Zframe-source-file^M
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.c^M
^Z^Zframe-source-file-end^M
:^M
^Z^Zframe-source-line^M
15^M
^Z^Zframe-source-end^M
^M
^M
^Z^Zsource /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.c:15:103:beg:0x555555555183^M
^M
^Z^Zframe-end^M
^M
^Z^Zstopped^M
^M
^Z^Zpre-prompt^M
(gdb) ^M
^Z^Zprompt^M
FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: run until main breakpoint (timeout)
The issue is the now hardcoded order of "breakpoints-invalid" and
"frames-invalid" order in the test regexp, where the output happens in
the other order. Before your change, we had:
"\(\(\r\n\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\)|\(\r\n\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\)\)*\r\n\r\n" \
Meaning we didn't care about the order of those, and we didn't care if
we saw them or not. The change below moves those lines in optional_re,
and fixes things on my side.
From ce3aa014dc9739f2ccaccc6348b795ce1d86366a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:36:27 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] fix
Change-Id: I9ea90dd0d162764b5b6d395c033d73e4d096cf51
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp
index 40a13e7cf190..f7e108758b18 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp
@@ -23,8 +23,6 @@ if ![target_can_use_run_cmd] {
return 0
}
-set breakpoints_invalid "\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\r\n"
-
#
# test running programs
#
@@ -140,6 +138,8 @@ set libthread_db_re \
[multi_line \
"\\\[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled\\\]" \
"Using host libthread_db library \[^\r\n\]+\r\n"]
+set breakpoints_invalid_re "\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\r\n"
+set frames_invalid_re "\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\r\n"
set optional_re \
[list \
@@ -151,6 +151,10 @@ set optional_re \
"\($libthread_db_re\)" \
"|" \
"\(\r\n$warning_gdb_index_re\)?" \
+ "|" \
+ "\($breakpoints_invalid_re\)" \
+ "|" \
+ "\($frames_invalid_re\)" \
"\)*"]
set optional_re [join $optional_re ""]
@@ -161,10 +165,6 @@ set run_re \
$optional_re \
"\r\n\032\032starting\r\n" \
$optional_re \
- "\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\r\n" \
- $optional_re \
- "\r\n\032\032breakpoints-invalid\r\n" \
- $optional_re \
"\r\n\032\032breakpoint 1\r\n" \
"\r\n" \
"Breakpoint 1, " \
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ gdb_test_multiple "break printf" "break printf" {
#
# get to printf
#
-set pat_begin "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\nContinuing.\r\n\r\n\032\032starting\r\n\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\r\n${breakpoints_invalid}\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\r\n"
+set pat_begin "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\nContinuing.\r\n\r\n\032\032starting\r\n\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\r\n${breakpoints_invalid_re}\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\r\n"
set pat_adjust "warning: Breakpoint 3 address previously adjusted from $hex to $hex.\r\n"
set pat_end "\r\n\032\032breakpoint 3\r\n\r\nBreakpoint 3, \r\n\032\032frame-begin 0 $hex\r\n\r\n(\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n)*.*\032\032frame-function-name\r\n.*printf(@.*)?\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n.*\032\032frame-end\r\n\r\n\032\032stopped\r\n$gdb_prompt$"
@@ -336,19 +336,19 @@ if [target_info exists gdb,nosignals] {
# delete all the breakpoints
#
gdb_test_multiple "delete 1" "delete bp 1" {
- -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n${breakpoints_invalid}$gdb_prompt$" {
+ -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n${breakpoints_invalid_re}$gdb_prompt$" {
pass $gdb_test_name
}
}
gdb_test_multiple "delete 2" "delete bp 2" {
- -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n${breakpoints_invalid}$gdb_prompt$" {
+ -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n${breakpoints_invalid_re}$gdb_prompt$" {
pass $gdb_test_name
}
}
gdb_test_multiple "delete 3" "delete bp 3" {
- -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n${breakpoints_invalid}$gdb_prompt$" {
+ -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n${breakpoints_invalid_re}$gdb_prompt$" {
pass $gdb_test_name
}
}
base-commit: 4f7df13ee75be36ae5c6046b6d6f60e04498b719
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 13:47 Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-04-07 14:10 ` Tom Tromey
2022-04-07 18:38 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2022-04-08 9:04 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-04-11 8:43 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-04-11 15:21 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1c39b8f-5181-dba0-42b5-df7c96aacaf5@polymtl.ca \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox