Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change some arguments to gdb::string_view instead of name+len
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 18:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1b65927-0e75-523d-fde2-330adf682114@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191001173345.48753-1-cbiesinger@google.com>

On 10/1/19 6:33 PM, Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches wrote:
> -  if (linkage_name[len] != '\0')
> +  /* Don't use string_view::operator[] because we are accessing beyond
> +     the size of the string_view, which is technically unsupported.  */
> +  if (linkage_name.data ()[linkage_name.length ()] != '\0')
>      {
>        char *alloc_name;

It's more than just unsupported, it's undefined behavior.  If we're promising
the string_view interface, then it's supposedly valid to pass in a string_view
that happens to point just at the end of a page, with the one-past-the-end
byte living in an unmapped page.  Dereferencing the one-past-end byte in
that case SIGSEGVs.

> -  if (ms_type == mst_file_text && startswith (name, "__gnu_compiled"))
> +  if (ms_type == mst_file_text && startswith (name.data (), "__gnu_compiled"))
>      return (NULL);
>  

This, via startswith also assumes that name.data() is a null-terminated
string.

I wonder whether we should have a zstring_view type.  like string_view, but
assumes/requires null-terminated.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-01 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-29  5:34 Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-30 14:28 ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-30 14:38   ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-30 16:23     ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-30 19:33       ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-30 19:33         ` [PATCH v2] " Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-30 19:46           ` [PATCH v3] " Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-30 20:02             ` [PATCH v4] " Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-10-01 17:18               ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-01 17:26                 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-10-01 17:26                   ` [PATCH] " Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-10-01 17:33                   ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-10-01 18:23                     ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2019-10-01 18:27                       ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-10-01 18:31                         ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-10-01 19:10                         ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-01 19:30                           ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-10-02 14:45                             ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-02 18:44                               ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d1b65927-0e75-523d-fde2-330adf682114@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=cbiesinger@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox