From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
To: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Fix a FAIL in attach.exp under native-extended-gdbserver
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 22:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc0be934-6cca-2beb-197f-d429fa8e13c7@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1521043903-18837-4-git-send-email-arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Andreas,
On 2018-03-14 12:11 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote:
> The attach.exp test case yields a FAIL with native-extended-gdbserver when
> trying to start a new process. This is because gdbserver does not support
> starting new processes. And since the gdbserver-base board file sets the
> GDB command line option -ex "set auto-connect-native-target off", the
> process is not started on the native target either. An error message
> results instead:
>
> Don't know how to run. Try "help target".
>
> Thus just accept this error when not running on a native target.
It is not true that gdbserver can't run a new process, in fact it can in the
extended-remote protocol (as opposed to remote). Start gdbserver with:
$ ./gdbserver/gdbserver --once --multi :1234
And
$ ./gdb --data-directory=data-directory
(gdb) tar ext :1234
(gdb) set remote exec-file /usr/bin/gnome-calculator
(gdb) run
Still, I first thought this test wouldn't be applicable to the extended-remote
protocol because I though you couldn't mix -p with connecting to a remote target
on startup, but it seems like this works:
$ pidof gnome-calculator
20001
$ ./gdb --data-directory=data-directory -iex "tar ext :1234" -p 20001 -ex "set remote exec-file /usr/bin/gnome-calculator" -ex "start"
So it might be possible to tweak the test case to adapt it to the extended-remote
protocol (add the -iex and "set remote exec-file" bits).
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-15 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-14 16:12 [PATCH 0/3] Some gdbserver test suite fixes Andreas Arnez
2018-03-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] Fix a FAIL in attach.exp under native-extended-gdbserver Andreas Arnez
2018-03-15 22:17 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2018-04-25 9:32 ` Andreas Arnez
2018-03-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] Fix tspeed test case: copy libinproctrace to target Andreas Arnez
2018-03-15 21:40 ` Simon Marchi
2018-03-16 19:41 ` Andreas Arnez
2018-03-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] Testsuite: Rename "end()" to avoid libinproctrace C++ symbol clash Andreas Arnez
2018-03-15 21:58 ` Simon Marchi
2018-03-16 19:47 ` Andreas Arnez
2018-03-16 21:57 ` Simon Marchi
2018-03-19 12:15 ` Andreas Arnez
2018-03-26 14:44 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc0be934-6cca-2beb-197f-d429fa8e13c7@ericsson.com \
--to=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
--cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox