From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] gdb: Don't skip prologue for explicit line breakpoints in assembler
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 22:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b474d566-32bf-98d1-de1c-ac41c03b56ac@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <95293b54fddd6327ba75d1d69ce7c2118c02cb70.1562003938.git.andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
LGTM. A couple nits below.
On 7/1/19 7:03 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> + This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
> +
> + Test that a breakpoint place by line number in an assembler file
"placed", I believe.
> + will stop at the specified line. Previously versions of GDB have
> + incorrectly invoked the prologue analysis logic and skipped
> + forward. */
> +
> + .text
> + .global main
> +main:
> + nop
> +test:
> + /* The next two instructions are required to look like an
> + x86-64 prologue so that GDB's prologue scanner will spot
> + them and skip forward. */
spaces vs tabs.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-03 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 12:34 [PATCH] " Andrew Burgess
2019-06-20 1:11 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-06-20 20:58 ` Andrew Burgess
2019-06-20 23:23 ` Andrew Burgess
2019-06-21 3:20 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-06-21 13:43 ` Pedro Alves
2019-06-22 11:06 ` Andrew Burgess
2019-06-22 11:23 ` Andrew Burgess
2019-06-24 19:16 ` Pedro Alves
2019-06-24 19:54 ` [PROTOTYPE] Make "info breakpoints" show breakpoint's specs (Re: [PATCH] gdb: Don't skip prologue for explicit line breakpoints in assembler) Pedro Alves
2019-07-03 22:37 ` Pedro Alves
2019-06-24 19:16 ` [PATCH] gdb: Don't skip prologue for explicit line breakpoints in assembler Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 17:12 ` Andrew Burgess
2019-07-01 18:03 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] " Andrew Burgess
2019-07-03 22:13 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2019-07-01 18:03 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] gdb: Remove unneeded parameter from set_breakpoint_location_function Andrew Burgess
2019-07-03 22:13 ` Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 18:03 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] Changes for explicit_line tracking, and prologue skipping Andrew Burgess
2019-07-01 18:21 ` [PATCH] gdb: Don't skip prologue for explicit line breakpoints in assembler Pedro Alves
2019-07-02 8:28 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b474d566-32bf-98d1-de1c-ac41c03b56ac@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox