Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
Subject: Re: [OB PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Handle removed valgrind option --db-attach
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 19:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af151666-a1cf-9231-1d32-be21cd875ab9@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <961cdab7-7882-6795-fac3-561db78d6593@redhat.com>

On 10/24/18 6:29 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/24/2018 12:13 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When running valgrind-db-attach.exp with valgrind version 3.13.0, we get:
>> ...
>> PASS: gdb.base/valgrind-db-attach.exp: spawn valgrind
>> valgrind: Unknown option: --db-attach=yes
>> valgrind: Use --help for more information or consult the user manual.
>> ERROR: Process no longer exists
>> UNRESOLVED: gdb.base/valgrind-db-attach.exp: valgrind started
>> ...
>>
>> The valgrind option --db-attach has been deprecated in version 3.10.0, and
>> removed in version 3.11.0.
>>
> 
> But was it replaced with / renamed to something else equivalent,
> or the functionality completely eliminated?
> 

From http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/dist.news.html:
...
* ================== DEPRECATED FEATURES =================

* --db-attach is now deprecated and will be removed in the next
  valgrind feature release.  The built-in GDB server capabilities are
  superior and should be used instead. Learn more here:

http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/manual-core-adv.html#manual-core-adv.gdbserver
...

I'd say the functionality was replaced with vgdb, which is exercised in
other test-cases (valgrind-infcall.exp, valgrind-disp-step.exp).

> If the latter, I don't see much value in keeping the
> test case around going forward.  Especially if we have no
> comment in the source indicating when it stopped being useful...

I could add this (similar to the "valgrind is not >= 3.7.0" comment in
valgrind-infcall.exp):
...
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/valgrind-db-attach.exp
b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/valgrind-db-attach.exp
index 3e40283a95..dd13b4d170 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/valgrind-db-attach.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/valgrind-db-attach.exp
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ set test "valgrind started"
 # The trailing '.' differs for different memcheck versions.
 gdb_test_multiple "" $test {
     -re "valgrind: Unknown option: --db-attach=yes" {
+       # valgrind is not <= 3.10.0.
        unsupported $test
        return -1
     }
...
?

> It ends up just being dead weight and future gdb developers
> won't even realize.
> 

True. I can also remove the testcase.

Thanks,
- Tom


  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-24 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20181024111355.GA13788@delia>
2018-10-24 16:29 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-24 19:34   ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2018-10-24 20:50   ` Philippe Waroquiers
2018-10-25 10:09     ` Tom de Vries
2018-10-25 12:16       ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-25 14:26         ` [PATCH OB][gdb/testsuite] Move valgrind-db-attach.{c,exp} to valgrind-bt.{c,exp} Tom de Vries
2018-10-25 15:08         ` [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Factor out lib/valgrind.exp Tom de Vries
2018-10-25 15:25           ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-25 20:03             ` Philippe Waroquiers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=af151666-a1cf-9231-1d32-be21cd875ab9@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox