* [rfa] Remove doc/libgdb.texinfo
@ 2002-01-20 14:11 Andrew Cagney
2002-01-21 1:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-01-20 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hello,
The file libgdb.texinfo which dates back to '93 turns out to not be used
in current documentation. Adding to the fun, it is still (C) Cygnus
(oops!).
I can think of two possible things to do to that file:
o delete it (per attached)
o make it FSF (Red Hat nee Cygnus have
no problems there) and say integrate
it into gdbint.texinfo as an historical
reference.
thoughts?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa] Remove doc/libgdb.texinfo
2002-01-20 14:11 [rfa] Remove doc/libgdb.texinfo Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-01-21 1:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-01-23 10:38 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2002-01-21 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> The file libgdb.texinfo which dates back to '93 turns out to not be used
> in current documentation. Adding to the fun, it is still (C) Cygnus
> (oops!).
>
> I can think of two possible things to do to that file:
>
> o delete it (per attached)
>
> o make it FSF (Red Hat nee Cygnus have
> no problems there) and say integrate
> it into gdbint.texinfo as an historical
> reference.
>
> thoughts?
My vote is for removing that file altogether. It doesn't hold any
useful information.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa] Remove doc/libgdb.texinfo
2002-01-21 1:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2002-01-23 10:38 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-01-23 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: gdb-patches
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>
>> The file libgdb.texinfo which dates back to '93 turns out to not be used
>> in current documentation. Adding to the fun, it is still (C) Cygnus
>> (oops!).
>>
>> I can think of two possible things to do to that file:
>>
>> o delete it (per attached)
>>
>> o make it FSF (Red Hat nee Cygnus have
>> no problems there) and say integrate
>> it into gdbint.texinfo as an historical
>> reference.
>>
>> thoughts?
>
>
> My vote is for removing that file altogether. It doesn't hold any
> useful information.
Ok, going, going, gone. trunk and 5.1 branch.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-23 18:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-20 14:11 [rfa] Remove doc/libgdb.texinfo Andrew Cagney
2002-01-21 1:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-01-23 10:38 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox