From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9727 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2002 18:38:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9604 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2002 18:38:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2002 18:38:01 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716DD3C81; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:37:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C4F0302.90009@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:38:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Remove doc/libgdb.texinfo References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00702.txt.bz2 > On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >> The file libgdb.texinfo which dates back to '93 turns out to not be used >> in current documentation. Adding to the fun, it is still (C) Cygnus >> (oops!). >> >> I can think of two possible things to do to that file: >> >> o delete it (per attached) >> >> o make it FSF (Red Hat nee Cygnus have >> no problems there) and say integrate >> it into gdbint.texinfo as an historical >> reference. >> >> thoughts? > > > My vote is for removing that file altogether. It doesn't hold any > useful information. Ok, going, going, gone. trunk and 5.1 branch. Andrew