Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>,
	     Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Longjmp vs LD_POINTER_GUARD revisited
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911151833510.28152@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091115173429.GB23483@caradoc.them.org>

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> should continue stepping.  For x86_64 glibc, the magic name is
> "__longjmp".  Otherwise, we do a frame check as before.

Nowadays you may need to handle ____longjmp_chk for glibc 2.11 as well.  
Because distribution compilers may or may not enable _FORTIFY_SOURCE by 
default, I suppose in principle the tests should be run explicitly with 
different settings.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-15 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-15 17:35 Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-15 18:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-15 18:30 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-11-15 22:36   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-15 23:06     ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-11-16 14:37       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-16 14:55         ` Pedro Alves
2009-11-16 14:56           ` Pedro Alves
2009-11-16 15:05           ` Pedro Alves
2009-11-16 17:50           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-15 18:39 ` Joseph S. Myers [this message]
2009-11-15 21:52   ` Mark Kettenis
2009-11-15 22:37     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-16 15:15     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-11-16 15:40       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-11-16 15:43         ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-11-16 16:19         ` Mark Kettenis
2009-11-16 15:59       ` Mark Kettenis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0911151833510.28152@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
    --to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox