Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* mips-tdep.c: Use is_mips16_addr() to test for the MIPS16 mode
@ 2007-07-20 13:50 Maciej W. Rozycki
  2007-07-20 15:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2007-07-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Maciej W. Rozycki

Hello,

 We have a function to check whether an address of instruction implies the 
MIPS16 mode or not.  However mips_next_pc() checks that directly.  Here is 
a fix.  No regressions for mipsisa32-sde-elf, with mips-sim-sde32/-EB and 
mips-sim-sde32/-mips16/-EB.

2007-07-20  Maciej W. Rozycki  <macro@mips.com>

	* mips-tdep.c (mips_next_pc): Use is_mips16_addr() instead of
	a direct test.

 OK to apply?

  Maciej

gdb-mips_next_pc.diff
Index: binutils-quilt/src/gdb/mips-tdep.c
===================================================================
--- binutils-quilt.orig/src/gdb/mips-tdep.c	2007-07-19 18:15:07.000000000 +0100
+++ binutils-quilt/src/gdb/mips-tdep.c	2007-07-19 18:27:51.000000000 +0100
@@ -1437,11 +1437,11 @@
    target monitor or stub is not developed enough to do a single_step.
    It works by decoding the current instruction and predicting where a
    branch will go. This isnt hard because all the data is available.
-   The MIPS32 and MIPS16 variants are quite different */
+   The MIPS32 and MIPS16 variants are quite different.  */
 static CORE_ADDR
 mips_next_pc (struct frame_info *frame, CORE_ADDR pc)
 {
-  if (pc & 0x01)
+  if (is_mips16_addr (pc))
     return mips16_next_pc (frame, pc);
   else
     return mips32_next_pc (frame, pc);


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: mips-tdep.c: Use is_mips16_addr() to test for the MIPS16 mode
  2007-07-20 13:50 mips-tdep.c: Use is_mips16_addr() to test for the MIPS16 mode Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2007-07-20 15:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-07-20 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maciej W. Rozycki; +Cc: gdb-patches, Maciej W. Rozycki

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 01:53:49PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>  We have a function to check whether an address of instruction implies the 
> MIPS16 mode or not.  However mips_next_pc() checks that directly.  Here is 
> a fix.  No regressions for mipsisa32-sde-elf, with mips-sim-sde32/-EB and 
> mips-sim-sde32/-mips16/-EB.
> 
> 2007-07-20  Maciej W. Rozycki  <macro@mips.com>
> 
> 	* mips-tdep.c (mips_next_pc): Use is_mips16_addr() instead of
> 	a direct test.
> 
>  OK to apply?

OK.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-20 15:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-20 13:50 mips-tdep.c: Use is_mips16_addr() to test for the MIPS16 mode Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-07-20 15:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox