* [RFA] tiny spelling corrections in gdbint.text
@ 2001-07-17 13:55 John R. Moore
2001-07-17 13:57 ` John R. Moore
2001-07-18 0:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: John R. Moore @ 2001-07-17 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
2001-07-17 John R. Moore <jmoore@redhat.com>
* gdbint.texinfo: fixed three misspelling words.
Index: gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/cvsfiles/devo/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.173
diff -p -u -r1.173 gdbint.texinfo
--- gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo 2001/07/13 23:56:09 1.173
+++ gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo 2001/07/17 20:48:53
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ to debugger commands.
@value{GDBN} should be relatively permissive, such as for expressions.
While the compiler should be picky (or have the option to be made
-picky), since source code lives for a long time usuazlly, the
+picky), since source code lives for a long time usually, the
programmer doing debugging shouldn't be spending time figuring out to
mollify the debugger.
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ user says to continue, @value{GDBN} will
instruction, single-step, re-insert the trap, and continue on.
Since it literally overwrites the program being tested, the program area
-must be writeable, so this technique won't work on programs in ROM. It
+must be writable, so this technique won't work on programs in ROM. It
can also distort the behavior of programs that examine themselves,
although such a situation would be highly unusual.
@@ -4921,7 +4921,7 @@ owned by the Free Software Foundation" a
changes in many programs (not just @value{GDBN}, but GAS, Emacs, GCC,
etc) can be
contributed with only one piece of legalese pushed through the
-bureacracy and filed with the FSF. We can't start merging changes until
+bureaucracy and filed with the FSF. We can't start merging changes until
this paperwork is received by the FSF (their rules, which we follow
since we maintain it for them).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] tiny spelling corrections in gdbint.text
2001-07-17 13:55 [RFA] tiny spelling corrections in gdbint.text John R. Moore
@ 2001-07-17 13:57 ` John R. Moore
2001-07-18 0:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: John R. Moore @ 2001-07-17 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Oops, change the change log to say:
* gdbint.texinfo: Fixed three misspellings.
-------------------------------
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, John R. Moore wrote:
>
> 2001-07-17 John R. Moore <jmoore@redhat.com>
>
> * gdbint.texinfo: fixed three misspelling words.
>
> Index: gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/cvsfiles/devo/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.173
> diff -p -u -r1.173 gdbint.texinfo
> --- gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo 2001/07/13 23:56:09 1.173
> +++ gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo 2001/07/17 20:48:53
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ to debugger commands.
>
> @value{GDBN} should be relatively permissive, such as for expressions.
> While the compiler should be picky (or have the option to be made
> -picky), since source code lives for a long time usuazlly, the
> +picky), since source code lives for a long time usually, the
> programmer doing debugging shouldn't be spending time figuring out to
> mollify the debugger.
>
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ user says to continue, @value{GDBN} will
> instruction, single-step, re-insert the trap, and continue on.
>
> Since it literally overwrites the program being tested, the program area
> -must be writeable, so this technique won't work on programs in ROM. It
> +must be writable, so this technique won't work on programs in ROM. It
> can also distort the behavior of programs that examine themselves,
> although such a situation would be highly unusual.
>
> @@ -4921,7 +4921,7 @@ owned by the Free Software Foundation" a
> changes in many programs (not just @value{GDBN}, but GAS, Emacs, GCC,
> etc) can be
> contributed with only one piece of legalese pushed through the
> -bureacracy and filed with the FSF. We can't start merging changes until
> +bureaucracy and filed with the FSF. We can't start merging changes until
> this paperwork is received by the FSF (their rules, which we follow
> since we maintain it for them).
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] tiny spelling corrections in gdbint.text
2001-07-17 13:55 [RFA] tiny spelling corrections in gdbint.text John R. Moore
2001-07-17 13:57 ` John R. Moore
@ 2001-07-18 0:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2001-07-18 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John R. Moore; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, John R. Moore wrote:
> 2001-07-17 John R. Moore <jmoore@redhat.com>
>
> * gdbint.texinfo: fixed three misspelling words.
Thanks. Please commit this, if you didn't already.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-07-18 0:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-07-17 13:55 [RFA] tiny spelling corrections in gdbint.text John R. Moore
2001-07-17 13:57 ` John R. Moore
2001-07-18 0:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox