Re: [RFA] tiny spelling corrections in gdbint.text

["John R. Moore" <jmoore@redhat.com>]

Oops, change the change log to say:

	* gdbint.texinfo: Fixed three misspellings.

-------------------------------

On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, John R. Moore wrote:

>
> 2001-07-17  John R. Moore  <jmoore@redhat.com>
>
> 	* gdbint.texinfo: fixed three misspelling words.
>
> Index: gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/cvsfiles/devo/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.173
> diff -p -u -r1.173 gdbint.texinfo
> --- gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo	2001/07/13 23:56:09	1.173
> +++ gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo	2001/07/17 20:48:53
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ to debugger commands.
>
>  @value{GDBN} should be relatively permissive, such as for expressions.
>  While the compiler should be picky (or have the option to be made
> -picky), since source code lives for a long time usuazlly, the
> +picky), since source code lives for a long time usually, the
>  programmer doing debugging shouldn't be spending time figuring out to
>  mollify the debugger.
>
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ user says to continue, @value{GDBN} will
>  instruction, single-step, re-insert the trap, and continue on.
>
>  Since it literally overwrites the program being tested, the program area
> -must be writeable, so this technique won't work on programs in ROM.  It
> +must be writable, so this technique won't work on programs in ROM.  It
>  can also distort the behavior of programs that examine themselves,
>  although such a situation would be highly unusual.
>
> @@ -4921,7 +4921,7 @@ owned by the Free Software Foundation" a
>  changes in many programs (not just @value{GDBN}, but GAS, Emacs, GCC,
>  etc) can be
>  contributed with only one piece of legalese pushed through the
> -bureacracy and filed with the FSF.  We can't start merging changes until
> +bureaucracy and filed with the FSF.  We can't start merging changes until
>  this paperwork is received by the FSF (their rules, which we follow
>  since we maintain it for them).
>
>