RE: symbolic debug of loadable modules with kgdb light

[Caz Yokoyama <cazyokoyama@gmail.com>]

Hello Eli,
Actually I support your spellings. Ctrl-C is much popular than control-c,
BREAK is popular than break for break signal. SysRq-g should be BREAK-g as
Joel said.
-caz

-----Original Message-----
From: Eli Zaretskii [mailto:eliz@gnu.org] 
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:21 PM
To: Caz Yokoyama
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com; pedro@codesourcery.com;
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: symbolic debug of loadable modules with kgdb light

> From: Caz Yokoyama <cazyokoyama@gmail.com>
> Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz@gnu.org>, 	<pedro@codesourcery.com>,
<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:18:28 -0700
> 
> >> +set remote interrupt-sequence [Ctrl-C | BREAK | SysRq-g]
> >You changed the user interface again, this is really frustrating.
> Sorry for frustrating you. The reason I changed is the following words by
> Eli.
> 
> >Please use the same conventions for these keys as in the portion you are
> replacing.  >For example, BREAK should be in caps and control-c should be
> spelled Ctrl-C.

I'm sorry, it seems I didn't make myself clear.  What I meant by the
above is that these should be spelled like that in the manual.  I
didn't mean to suggest that the interface should be changed, just that
when you are speaking about these key sequences, spell them as
elsewhere in the manual.