From: "Philippe Waroquiers" <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
To: "Yao Qi" <yao@codesourcery.com>, "Pedro Alves" <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, "Tom Tromey" <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ping: Re: PATCH : allow to set length of hw watchpoints (e.g. for Valgrind gdbserver)
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 05:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EA74456777B44B82BD0758CE7DED2DC1@soleil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE317B1.1040200@codesourcery.com>
> One new command "set remote hardware-watchpoint-length-limit"
> is added in the patch, which is only useful to gdbserver+valgrind.
> When gdb is talking with normal gdbserver, it may be wrong to set
> hardware-watchpoint-length-limit in gdb side. Users should be careful
> when using this command.
I think the command is also useful in other cases
(cfr my other post of yesterday http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-05/msg00664.html).
But if you believe this should be aimed only (or mainly) at Valgrind gdbserver,
I can update the patch (e.g. the documentation + change length default value)
to make it more Valgrind gdbserver specific.
> The ideal solution, IMO, is remote side gives GDB the value of
> hardware-watchpoint-length-limit, however, I don't know it is easy or
> hard to do such thing.
An approach where the remote side would tell which hw watchpoints are ok is the best.
It was discussed in another thread, but that is not easy to do.
E.g. for the moment, which hw watchpoints are accepted depends
on the order in which gdb inserts the watchpoints.
Currently, depending of the order of watchpoint insertion, you will even
trigger a bug in x86/amd64 gdbserver (cfr http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-05/msg00664.html).
Philippe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-30 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-21 22:20 Philippe Waroquiers
2011-05-26 19:02 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-29 13:01 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-05-30 15:26 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-05-31 19:07 ` x86 watchpoints bug (Re: ping: Re: PATCH : allow to set length of hw watchpoints (e.g. for Valgrind gdbserver)) Pedro Alves
2011-05-31 20:25 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-05-31 20:53 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-31 21:29 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-31 22:15 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-05-31 23:04 ` Pedro Alves
2011-06-01 14:35 ` Pedro Alves
2011-06-08 22:55 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-06-09 0:00 ` Pedro Alves
2011-06-09 22:16 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-07-21 17:20 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-22 16:40 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-07-22 16:43 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-23 16:28 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-07-26 20:02 ` software watchpoints bug (was: Re: x86 watchpoints bug) Pedro Alves
2011-07-27 3:45 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-07-22 17:19 ` x86 watchpoints bug (Re: ping: Re: PATCH : allow to set length of hw watchpoints (e.g. for Valgrind gdbserver)) Pedro Alves
2011-05-27 3:25 ` ping: Re: PATCH : allow to set length of hw watchpoints (e.g. for Valgrind gdbserver) Yao Qi
2011-05-27 17:53 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-27 17:59 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-30 4:06 ` Yao Qi
2011-05-30 5:34 ` Philippe Waroquiers [this message]
2011-05-30 5:48 ` Yao Qi
2011-05-30 6:31 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-05-31 17:31 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-31 18:06 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-06-01 15:15 ` Pedro Alves
2011-06-05 20:55 ` Philippe Waroquiers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EA74456777B44B82BD0758CE7DED2DC1@soleil \
--to=philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox