Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe Waroquiers" <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
To: "Pedro Alves" <pedro@codesourcery.com>,	<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: <yao@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: x86 watchpoints bug (Re: ping: Re: PATCH : allow to set length of hw watchpoints (e.g. for Valgrind gdbserver))
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BB85C0C7E4DE4A759F5FCA4D62B30B55@soleil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107211712.26443.pedro@codesourcery.com>

> I think nothing else changed in the patch.

I looked at the new patch and re-tested on f12/x86 and debian5/amd64, using 7.3.
Behaviour looks ok to me regarding the handling of debug registers.
(note I tested with the patch allowing to change the remote hw watchpoint length,
which I believe could be committed soon : FSF papers ok, waiting for a user now).

During the testing, I however found something else slightly strange.
With reference to the previous s.c test program, watching a string length 1000
is ok at the start (handled as a sw breakpoint), but this watchpoint cannot be disabled
then re-enabled:
   (gdb) watch s1000
   Hardware watchpoint 1: s1000
   (gdb) start     <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< this runs slowly as s1000 is sw-watched
   Temporary breakpoint 2 at 0x400480: file s.c, line 22.
   Starting program: /home/philippe/gdb/s 
   Error in re-setting breakpoint 1: Expression cannot be implemented with read/access watchpoint.
   Error in re-setting breakpoint 1: Expression cannot be implemented with read/access watchpoint.
   Error in re-setting breakpoint 1: Expression cannot be implemented with read/access watchpoint.

   Temporary breakpoint 2, main () at s.c:22
   22    char * p = s1000;
   (gdb) dis 1
   (gdb) ena 1
   Cannot enable watchpoint 1: Expression cannot be implemented with read/access watchpoint.
   (gdb) 
At this point, if the watchpoint is deleted then re-created, then the watchpoint is again 'sw-accepted'.
Note that this looks to be a regression in 7.3.50.20110722-cvs, as I do not see the same problem on 7.2.
This regression is not linked with the DR patch (occurs both with the patched/non patched 7.3.50).

So, in summary:
  * the patch for the i386 debug register fix looks ok.
The following strange behaviours/bugs have still to be fixed or looked at:
  * handling of duplicate locations across disabled breakpoints
     (resulting in wrongly duplicated z packets and/or missing active debug registers in native)
  * watch s1000 then run then disable then enable impossible

 There was also a 'nice to have' which could be looked at:
  * ensure that the insertion of watchpoint is done using the order of breakpoints
     (so as to not have a new watchpoint causing an error/rejection on a previously accepted
      watchpoint).

Thanks for all the work

Philippe


  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-22 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-21 22:20 ping: Re: PATCH : allow to set length of hw watchpoints (e.g. for Valgrind gdbserver) Philippe Waroquiers
2011-05-26 19:02 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-29 13:01   ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-05-30 15:26     ` Joel Brobecker
2011-05-31 19:07     ` x86 watchpoints bug (Re: ping: Re: PATCH : allow to set length of hw watchpoints (e.g. for Valgrind gdbserver)) Pedro Alves
2011-05-31 20:25       ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-05-31 20:53         ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-31 21:29       ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-31 22:15         ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-05-31 23:04           ` Pedro Alves
2011-06-01 14:35             ` Pedro Alves
2011-06-08 22:55               ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-06-09  0:00                 ` Pedro Alves
2011-06-09 22:16                   ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-07-21 17:20                     ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-22 16:40                       ` Philippe Waroquiers [this message]
2011-07-22 16:43                         ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-23 16:28                           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-07-26 20:02                             ` software watchpoints bug (was: Re: x86 watchpoints bug) Pedro Alves
2011-07-27  3:45                               ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-07-22 17:19                         ` x86 watchpoints bug (Re: ping: Re: PATCH : allow to set length of hw watchpoints (e.g. for Valgrind gdbserver)) Pedro Alves
2011-05-27  3:25 ` ping: Re: PATCH : allow to set length of hw watchpoints (e.g. for Valgrind gdbserver) Yao Qi
2011-05-27 17:53   ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-27 17:59     ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-30  4:06       ` Yao Qi
2011-05-30  5:34         ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-05-30  5:48           ` Yao Qi
2011-05-30  6:31             ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-05-31 17:31         ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-31 18:06           ` Philippe Waroquiers
2011-06-01 15:15             ` Pedro Alves
2011-06-05 20:55               ` Philippe Waroquiers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BB85C0C7E4DE4A759F5FCA4D62B30B55@soleil \
    --to=philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox