Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
To: "'Tom Tromey'" <tromey@redhat.com>,
	       "'Jan Kratochvil'"	<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [rfc] Print MI fullname even for non-existing files
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E59706EF8DB1D147B15BECA3322E4BDC04CEB7@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8738z4y1el.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org 
> [mailto:gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Tom Tromey
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 1:33 PM
> To: Jan Kratochvil
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [rfc] Print MI fullname even for non-existing files
> 
> >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> Jan> symtab_to_fullname now always returns non-NULL.
> 
> Jan> Currently this patch only changes from user point of view MI:
> Jan> (gdb) -file-list-exec-source-file
> Jan> 	^done,line="1",file="deleted.c",macro-info="0"
> -> 
> Jan> 	
> ^done,line="1",file="deleted.c",fullname="/path/to/deleted.c",
> macro-info="0"
> 
> Jan> Is there a serious reason why fullname was suppressed for
> Jan> non-existing files?  While it breaks MI compatibility in 
> some way I
> Jan> find it an acceptable change.
> 
> It seems pretty reasonable to me as well.

For what it's worth, that is an ok change for Eclipse (we don't
use that command).

Marc 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-20 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-17 15:59 Jan Kratochvil
2012-12-17 16:13 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-12-17 18:36   ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-12-17 16:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-12-17 16:36   ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-12-17 18:33 ` Tom Tromey
2012-12-17 18:37   ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-12-17 18:41     ` Tom Tromey
2012-12-17 18:59       ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-12-28  0:17         ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-12-28  9:09           ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2012-12-20 14:33   ` Marc Khouzam [this message]
2012-12-25  8:04     ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-03 15:38       ` Marc Khouzam
2013-01-03 15:44         ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-03 16:04           ` Tom Tromey
2013-01-03 16:57             ` Joel Brobecker
2013-04-02 16:24 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E59706EF8DB1D147B15BECA3322E4BDC04CEB7@eusaamb103.ericsson.se \
    --to=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox