Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* info about reading dwarf2 set types
@ 2005-10-18 14:26 Gaius Mulley
  2005-10-21 19:19 ` Waldek Hebisch
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gaius Mulley @ 2005-10-18 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches; +Cc: hebisch


Hi,

last May, Waldek Hebisch, posted a patch to allow gdb to read set
types when the debugging information was held in dwarf2 format.  I see
that the patch was not applied to the current CVS or the gdb-6.3
branch, and I was wondering why this was the case?

I'm working on GNU Modula-2 and have bumped into the same problem as
the GNU Pascal folks have seen (namely if gm2 produces debugging
output in dwarf2 then gdb falls over when reading set types, whereas
if I use -gstabs+ then set types work fine). I'm particularly
interested in knowing why the patch was not applied as one reason
might be that the patch was wrong (and gdb is correct - thus this
would indicate that the "bug" is in the gcc/gm2 frontend).

I'm also working on enhancing the gdb modula-2 language mode (I've
completed long set support - printing set data and ptype - which
hopefully can be included in the future).

regards,
Gaius


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: info about reading dwarf2 set types
  2005-10-18 14:26 info about reading dwarf2 set types Gaius Mulley
@ 2005-10-21 19:19 ` Waldek Hebisch
  2005-10-24 23:05   ` Jim Blandy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Waldek Hebisch @ 2005-10-21 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gaius Mulley; +Cc: gdb-patches, hebisch

Gaius Mulley wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> last May, Waldek Hebisch, posted a patch to allow gdb to read set
> types when the debugging information was held in dwarf2 format.  I see
> that the patch was not applied to the current CVS or the gdb-6.3
> branch, and I was wondering why this was the case?
> 

The patch is still waiting for review. I did not ping it since I spent
most of the last four month off-line.

-- 
                              Waldek Hebisch
hebisch@math.uni.wroc.pl 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: info about reading dwarf2 set types
  2005-10-21 19:19 ` Waldek Hebisch
@ 2005-10-24 23:05   ` Jim Blandy
  2005-10-28 20:35     ` Waldek Hebisch
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jim Blandy @ 2005-10-24 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Waldek Hebisch; +Cc: Gaius Mulley, gdb-patches


Waldek Hebisch <hebisch@math.uni.wroc.pl> writes:
> Gaius Mulley wrote:
>> last May, Waldek Hebisch, posted a patch to allow gdb to read set
>> types when the debugging information was held in dwarf2 format.  I see
>> that the patch was not applied to the current CVS or the gdb-6.3
>> branch, and I was wondering why this was the case?
>
> The patch is still waiting for review. I did not ping it since I spent
> most of the last four month off-line.

I can't approve changes to the Dwarf 2 reader any more, but for what
it's worth, the patch looks fine to me.  Have you run the test suite
on the current sources with and without the patch, to check for regressions?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: info about reading dwarf2 set types
  2005-10-24 23:05   ` Jim Blandy
@ 2005-10-28 20:35     ` Waldek Hebisch
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Waldek Hebisch @ 2005-10-28 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jim Blandy; +Cc: Waldek Hebisch, Gaius Mulley, gdb-patches

> 
> Waldek Hebisch <hebisch@math.uni.wroc.pl> writes:
> > Gaius Mulley wrote:
> >> last May, Waldek Hebisch, posted a patch to allow gdb to read set
> >> types when the debugging information was held in dwarf2 format.  I see
> >> that the patch was not applied to the current CVS or the gdb-6.3
> >> branch, and I was wondering why this was the case?
> >
> > The patch is still waiting for review. I did not ping it since I spent
> > most of the last four month off-line.
> 
> I can't approve changes to the Dwarf 2 reader any more, but for what
> it's worth, the patch looks fine to me.  Have you run the test suite
> on the current sources with and without the patch, to check for regressions?
> 

I did run the testsuite when I have submitted the patch.  I can re-run
it with the current version.

-- 
                              Waldek Hebisch
hebisch@math.uni.wroc.pl 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-28 20:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-10-18 14:26 info about reading dwarf2 set types Gaius Mulley
2005-10-21 19:19 ` Waldek Hebisch
2005-10-24 23:05   ` Jim Blandy
2005-10-28 20:35     ` Waldek Hebisch

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox