From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6160 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2005 20:10:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6128 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2005 20:10:08 -0000 Received: from hera.math.uni.wroc.pl (HELO hera.math.uni.wroc.pl) (156.17.86.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:10:08 +0000 Received: from hebisch by hera.math.uni.wroc.pl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EVaWA-0003dy-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:08:02 +0200 Subject: Re: info about reading dwarf2 set types In-Reply-To: To: Jim Blandy Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:35:00 -0000 CC: Waldek Hebisch , Gaius Mulley , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: From: Waldek Hebisch X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2 > > Waldek Hebisch writes: > > Gaius Mulley wrote: > >> last May, Waldek Hebisch, posted a patch to allow gdb to read set > >> types when the debugging information was held in dwarf2 format. I see > >> that the patch was not applied to the current CVS or the gdb-6.3 > >> branch, and I was wondering why this was the case? > > > > The patch is still waiting for review. I did not ping it since I spent > > most of the last four month off-line. > > I can't approve changes to the Dwarf 2 reader any more, but for what > it's worth, the patch looks fine to me. Have you run the test suite > on the current sources with and without the patch, to check for regressions? > I did run the testsuite when I have submitted the patch. I can re-run it with the current version. -- Waldek Hebisch hebisch@math.uni.wroc.pl