Re: [PATCH] not trigger pagination with dprintf

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 11:10:25 -0700
>> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,
>>       gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>>
>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
>> >
>> > Doug> I'm kinda on the fence, and I'd like to hear what other GMs think.
>> >
>> > I still don't understand what is wrong with asking the user to disable
>> > pagination if that is what is desired.  Maybe the user actually wants
>> > pagination sometimes.
>>
>> Me neither.
>> For the sake of discussion,
>> One could turn it around, however, and phrase the question as
>> "What should the default be while executing breakpoint commands?"
>
> What we do today, I guess, which means ON.

What I thought is:
Plan A, post "set pagination on" to 15182 as workaround.  And update
doc add some introduce to dprintf part about that if need.

Plan B, add a switch to current patch that can switch on and off of
pagination with commands.  It also need update doc for that.

I prefer A.  What about you?

Thanks,
Hui