Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,
	Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
		gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC - Python scripting] New methods Symtab.global_block and Symtab.static_block (docs included)
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 06:48:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGyQ6gzK7FvC0EYvJD+DGnCRssbNREoSjdROfpbv0u22sBNOKQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22TvvQDSA1EL4ydoZRGkKBm1kTCGcHyB2dc3X28p8XqyAg@mail.gmail.com>

Doug> It would not be unexpected to me if a symbol disappeared from either
Doug> list, moved from one list to another, or a new symbol appeared.

Even in the API currently public, Block.superblock can take a user to
global or static block and make him/her vulnerable to the above
problem.  But, can we view this from a different angle:  Let us first
take the case of a global block.  As I understand, this should very
definitely contain the global functions and global variables defined
in a source file.  If these two kinds of symbols do not change from
release to release, then we document saying that the user should rely
only on this information being constant.  Similarly, if my
understanding is correct, static functions and static variables
defined in a source file should always be present in a static block.
Hence, we again document saying that the user rely only on this
information being constant.  Does this sound reasonable?


  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-20  4:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-17  8:39 Siva Chandra
2012-04-17 13:00 ` Phil Muldoon
2012-04-17 17:34   ` Siva Chandra
2012-04-17 17:44     ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-17 17:41   ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-17 17:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]   ` <CAGyQ6gxxEeYeCKw_iHXh74Gg223GHxMoW=gvt9kU+ax396kKBQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-18  9:15     ` Siva Chandra
2012-04-18 20:45       ` Phil Muldoon
2012-04-18 20:48         ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-19 17:33           ` Siva Chandra
2012-04-19 19:18             ` Doug Evans
2012-04-20  6:48               ` Siva Chandra [this message]
2012-04-20 12:12                 ` Matt Rice
2012-04-20 14:16                   ` Doug Evans
2012-04-20 15:21                   ` Matt Rice
2012-04-20 19:12                   ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-20 19:53                     ` Doug Evans
2012-04-20 19:57                       ` Siva Chandra
2012-04-23 13:21                         ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-23 13:35                           ` Phil Muldoon
2012-04-23 14:11                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-23 14:45                               ` Phil Muldoon
2012-04-23 16:00                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-24 11:15                                   ` Siva Chandra
2012-04-24 17:40                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-25  7:11                                   ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-25  8:19                                     ` Siva Chandra
2012-04-26 12:35                                     ` Siva Chandra
2012-04-26 15:21                                       ` Doug Evans
2012-05-02 17:41                                         ` Siva Chandra
2012-05-02 18:15                                           ` Doug Evans
2012-05-03  7:13                                             ` Siva Chandra
2012-05-04 18:05                                               ` FAILing new testcase for -fdebug-types-section [Re: [RFC - Python scripting] New methods Symtab.global_block and Symtab.static_block (docs included)] Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-05  7:01                                                 ` Siva Chandra
2012-05-05  7:05                                                   ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-05  7:11                                                     ` Siva Chandra
2012-05-05  7:13                                                       ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-23 21:38                                                         ` [patch KFAIL] Re: FAILing new testcase for -fdebug-types-section (PR symtab/14148) Jan Kratochvil
2012-04-18 20:48       ` [RFC - Python scripting] New methods Symtab.global_block and Symtab.static_block (docs included) Tom Tromey
2012-04-20  8:13       ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-17 17:37 ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-18 18:41   ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-18 19:53     ` Siva Chandra
2012-04-18 20:49       ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGyQ6gzK7FvC0EYvJD+DGnCRssbNREoSjdROfpbv0u22sBNOKQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sivachandra@google.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox