From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Doug Evans <dje@google.com>,
uweigand@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix py-xmethods.c when compiled with -Werror against Python 2.4
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 18:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGyQ6gwH3RMcnpMxgoQtA9L9WkL=x9-7dvZbDjiZ7uCs=9zVAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140604181342.GW4289@adacore.com>
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>> Does the attached patch fix the issue pointed out by Ulrich Weigand
>> here: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-06/msg00169.html
>>
>> ChangeLog
>> 2014-06-04 Siva Chandra Reddy <sivachandra@google.com>
>>
>> * python/py-xmethods.c (invoke_match_method)
>> (gdbpy_get_matching_xmethod_workers, gdbpy_get_xmethod_arg_types):
>> Cast the second arg to PyObject_GetAttrString and
>> PyObject_GetAttrString to char *.
>
> I can't tell whether it fixes the problem - it should! - but looking
> at the patch, I think some lines might have become longer than 80
> characters...
I double checked again. Two of the lines are at 80. Rest of the lines
touched are less than 80.
> Also, it'd be nice to answer Ulrich's question regarding the use
> of the constants - whether it might make sense to use the string
> directly? Looking at the code, I think that it would be to avoid
> duplicating that string? enabled_field_name is only used once,
> but then you'd probably use the constant for ... consistency (;-)).
Yes. That is the reason. Sorry for not mentioning it earlier.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-04 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-04 18:05 Siva Chandra
2014-06-04 18:13 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-04 18:25 ` Siva Chandra [this message]
2014-06-04 19:24 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-04 19:23 ` Doug Evans
2014-06-04 19:57 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-04 20:53 ` Siva Chandra
2014-06-04 21:06 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGyQ6gwH3RMcnpMxgoQtA9L9WkL=x9-7dvZbDjiZ7uCs=9zVAQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sivachandra@google.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox