Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Do not classify C struct members as a filename
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGRskv_cTmN0Cic8gMmHW6A54tA3Kpm+8JGLxS8r8Jwv6GWMbg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c3f1fc7d56feaaa00ade76f51f7421f@polymtl.ca>

>
> I was able to reproduce the problem and confirmed that the patch fixes
> it.  I'm not very strong in the lexing/parsing area, but the change in
> c-exp.y makes sense to me.  I'd like to give others a chance to comment, so
> let's wait a few days.  If nobody answer, we can merge it.  One nit, since
> we are now using C++, can you use bool instead of int?  It won't match the
> old surrounding code, but that's a good reason to modernize the existing
> code later :).
>
> Do you know if we have a test for the same thing, but with the "this"
> pointer (which was already worked before this patch)?  If not, it would be
> nice to add it to the test as well.  You could add a call to D::includefile
> and continue/break there.  From there, you could test calling
> this->includefile().


Hi Simon, thanks for taking a look.

Sure, I can update the tests (I'll add some tests for checking
"c.includefile" while I'm at it) and change the int to a bool. I'm not 100%
sure on the procedure here, do you want me to upload a v3 as a new thread?

- Leszek


  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-25 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-24 16:51 Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches
2018-01-25  2:39 ` Simon Marchi
2018-01-25 10:04   ` Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches [this message]
2018-01-25 14:52     ` Simon Marchi
2018-01-25 15:09       ` [PATCH v3] " Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches
2018-01-25 16:00 ` [PATCH v2] " Tom Tromey
2018-01-25 16:20   ` [PATCH v4] " Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches
2018-02-02  3:35     ` Simon Marchi
2018-01-25 16:39   ` [PATCH v2] " Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGRskv_cTmN0Cic8gMmHW6A54tA3Kpm+8JGLxS8r8Jwv6GWMbg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=leszeks@google.com \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox