From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA 3/3] Windows-specific iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 04:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADPb22RwVgu3F_Wrp4bG-B=fBPBfm-arwF+EYKx7YfV8ZMMvzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338496603-5423-4-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com>
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
> This patch sets the windows target to use their own version of
> the iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order gdbarch method, in
> order to make global symbol searches sensitive to the current
> objfile.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> * windows-tdep.h (windows_iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order):
> Add declaration.
> * windows-tdep.c: #include "objfiles.h".
> (windows_iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order): New function.
> * amd64-windows-tdep.c (amd64_windows_init_abi): Set
> iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order gdbarch method to
> windows_iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order.
> * i386-cygwin-tdep.c (i386_cygwin_init_abi): Likewise.
>[...]
>+/* Implement the "iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order" gdbarch
>+ method. It searches all objfiles, starting with CURRENT_OBJFILE
>+ first (if not NULL).
>+
>+ On Windows, the system behaves a little differently when two
>+ objfiles each define a global symbol using the same name, compared
>+ to other platforms such as GNU/Linux for instance. On GNU/Linux,
>+ all instances of the symbol effectively get merged into a single
>+ one, but on Windows, they remain distinct.
>+
>+ As a result, it usually makes sense to start global symbol searches
>+ with the current objfile before expanding it to all other objfiles.
>+ This helps for instance when a user debugs some code in a DLL that
>+ refers to a global variable defined inside that DLL. When trying
>+ to print the value of that global variable, it would be unhelpful
>+ to print the value of another global variable defined with the same
>+ name, but in a different DLL. */
GDB's notion of a global symbol isn't a perfect match for ELF's notion.
I'm wondering if there are examples where we'd want this for ELF too.
[And are there examples where we don't want this for ELF?]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-04 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-31 20:37 [RFA 0/3] Make global symbol objfile search order arch-dependent Joel Brobecker
2012-05-31 20:37 ` [RFA 3/3] Windows-specific iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order Joel Brobecker
2012-06-02 13:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-06-02 15:32 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-06-02 15:49 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-06-04 4:55 ` Doug Evans [this message]
2012-06-04 13:02 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-31 20:37 ` [RFA 2/3] New "iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order" gdbarch method Joel Brobecker
2012-05-31 20:37 ` [RFA/commit 1/3] Revert "Search global symbols from the expression's block objfile first." Joel Brobecker
2012-06-01 18:06 ` [RFA 0/3] Make global symbol objfile search order arch-dependent Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADPb22RwVgu3F_Wrp4bG-B=fBPBfm-arwF+EYKx7YfV8ZMMvzA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dje@google.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox