From: Matt Rice <ratmice@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix target-async SIGTTOU stop (PR 12260)
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACTLOFrx3wqjz0ch6objbTyGfnukFo359=YhLbXpnFAROHMu-w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110823193156.GA30724@host1.jankratochvil.net>
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it is difficult to play with `set target-async on' as it usually SIGTTOU stops
> at various places.
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12260
>
> $ ./gdb -nx -ex 'set target-async on' -ex start ./gdb
> [...]
> Starting program: .../gdb/gdb
> [1]+ Stopped ./gdb -nx -ex 'set target-async on' -ex start ./gdb
>
> If it has a regression it IMO only means there is missing
> target_terminal_inferior call at some other place.
>
> No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora16pre-linux-gnu. But I was
> unable to reproduce the problem under DejaGnu so the regression test may not
> be meaningful.
>
> Not going to check it in without a review.
>
Not really a review, just thought i'd mention this is also fixed by
the following patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-08/msg00235.html
this also fixes the original report of PR 10720 which seems to be a
dupe, not sure about the latter reports in 10720.
the test cases i added do not cover this either.
to quote from elsewhere in that thread
matt> more information on PR 10720, which I'd had random difficulties
matt> reproducing, I managed to figure out why, the process being attached
matt> to must be on the same tty as the gdb process to reproduce it.
matt> Haven't been able to reproduce that in the testsuite though.
my guess is that deja-gnu doesn't meet this requirement to be able to
reproduce it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-24 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-23 19:32 Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-24 5:24 ` Matt Rice [this message]
2011-08-29 15:17 ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-29 15:26 ` Matt Rice
2011-09-23 16:33 ` cancel/resolved: " Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACTLOFrx3wqjz0ch6objbTyGfnukFo359=YhLbXpnFAROHMu-w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ratmice@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox